In the California Community Colleges (CCC) system, we collect data from 24 Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) identities. But most reports only reflect the outcomes of 3 distinct categories: Asian, Filipino, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander.

The RP Group
Let's Talk About

Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Students

In the California Community Colleges (CCC) system, we collect data from

24

Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) identities.

But most reports only reflect the outcomes of 

3

distinct categories: Asian, Filipino, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander combined.

While the CCC system collects 24 AANHPI categories, at least 74 distinct groups are reported at the national level, each with unique cultures, customs, heritages, languages, etc.


In honor of AANHPI Heritage Month, we are releasing a couple of data points that demonstrate the diversity that exists within our AANHPI CCC student populations and their outcomes. We must move beyond relying on three broad ethnic categories to truly serve our diverse student body. When we don’t, we unintentionally make vital student experiences invisible, particularly within our expansive AANHPI communities.


These disaggregated data are based on the most detailed AANHPI available, shining a light on what the disaggregation of AANHPI data looks like when we tease apart the Asian and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander groups.

 

Who Are Our AANHPI Students?

 

Southeast Asian and East Asian students make up the biggest proportion of AANHPI students in the CCC system. The two largest distinct groups are Filipino and Chinese. However, a significant proportion of students identify as Other Asian, which implies that additional AANHPI categories may be needed. 

AANHPI Student Population in the 2020 to 2021 Cohort by Expanded Ethnicity. Total of 60,674 students.
Total Southeast Asian students is 23,177. Filipino: 13,501. Vietnamese: 6,484. Cambodian: 1,020. Hmong: 911. Laotian: 689. Thai: 362. Indonesian: 210.
Total of East Asian students is 15,543. Chinese: 8,943. Japanese 3,232. Korean: 2,840. Taiwanese: 528.
Total of students described as Other Asian is 11,309.
Total of South Asian students is 6,807. Asian Indian: 5,179. Afghan: 864. Pakistani: 621. Bangladeshi: 143.
Total of Pacific Islander students is 3,838. Other Pacific Islander: 1,602. Native Hawaiian: 992. Samoan: 815. Guamanian or Chamorro: 429.

Note: Data are for the 2020-21 cohort disaggregated by expanded ethnicity, which is based on SB38. Categories include all students identifying with an ethnicity, whether multiethnic or multiracial. Students may be counted under multiple categories. Burmese, Fijian, Sri Lankan, and Tongan had fewer than 10 students and were suppressed in accordance with FERPA guidelines.

*Corrected image. 

How Are AANHPI Students Progressing Through the CCC System?

 

The data below reveal that while AANHPI students, as a whole, have a 23% three-year Vision 2030 degree completion rate in the CCC system, there are significant disparities among individual AANHPI student groups. Specifically, Indonesian (31%) and Vietnamese (30%) students exhibit the highest three-year completion rates, whereas Samoan (12%) and Native Hawaiian (14%) students experience the lowest rates compared to their AANHPI peers.

Vision Goal chart showing degree completion rate for 20 AANHPI student groups ranging from 12% to 31%.

Note: Vision Goal definition of completion- number of students who earned a CCCCO-approved certificate, associate degree, or community college bachelor’s degree within a 3-year timeframe for the 2020-21 cohort disaggregated by expanded ethnicity, which is based on SB38. Categories include all students identifying with an ethnicity, whether multiethnic or multiracial. Students may be counted under multiple categories. Burmese, Fijian, Sri Lankan, and Tongan had fewer than 10 students and were suppressed in accordance with FERPA guidelines.

Aggregating diverse groups into broad categories like “Asian” or “AANHPI” can mask significant inequities and the unique challenges faced by individual groups. By disaggregating data, we can uncover valuable insights and understand the nuances of various groups' experiences. This approach provides a more comprehensive picture of where individuals are thriving and where additional support could foster greater success. 


This commitment to greater visibility and nuance in our data is crucial for understanding specific needs, addressing inequities, and fostering an environment where every AANHPI student feels seen and supported.


For additional considerations, read our Visibility Guide: An Examination of Aggregation and Suppression Practices in Race and Ethnicity Data, a resource that examines how aggregation and suppression practices can hide or silence student experiences and offers alternative, more inclusive approaches.


We extend our sincere thanks to the California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office for providing the foundational data that makes these critical conversations possible.

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
YouTube
View in browser

The RP Group, 369-B Third Street #397, San Rafael, CA 94901, USA

Unsubscribe Manage preferences