How selecting the right flowmeter can help you minimise your annual energy costs

The extensive choice of flow technology options on offer can make selecting the correct flowmeter for an application a bewildering task. A broad range of factors can influence flowmeter selection, of which cost is just one.

Flowmeter technologies – narrowing down the choice

The pie chart shown below indicates the variety of flowmeter technologies available and their representation in the processing industries.

Of the technologies shown, electromagnetic, vortex, turbine, ultrasonic, and anemometer, all actually measure the flow velocity of the fluid in the pipe. Multiplying the measured average velocity by the cross-sectional area of the meter or pipe will give the value for volumetric flow rates.

Flowmeters based on differential pressure – orifice plates, nozzles, wedges, Venturis, and Pitot tubes – introduce a restriction in the flow. The unrecoverable pressure loss caused by the restriction is a measure of the volumetric flow rate.

With the impact of energy costs on the competitiveness of UK industrial companies, any step that can be taken to minimise energy consumption could provide a valuable first step towards enhanced profitability.

Positive displacement flowmeters are true volumetric flow devices, measuring the actual fluid volume that passes through a meter body with no concern for velocity. These flowmeters capture a specific volume of fluid and pass it to the outlet. The fluid pressure moves the mechanism that empties one chamber as another fills.

If the application requires a measure of the mass flow rate, volumetric flowmeters must be supplemented with additional information, such as fluid density, pressure, and/or temperature. Some multivariable flowmeters and transmitters incorporate an additional sensor to provide this information. On the other hand, Coriolis flowmeters (and thermal probes for gas) directly measure mass flow rate. With a current market share of around 18 percent, they are steadily finding their way into an increasing range of applications.

The table below shows the applicability of certain flowmeter technologies to various liquid and gas conditions. Green indicates the technology will generally work while red rules it out. Yellow indicates that the flowmeter technology may sometimes work provided that certain conditions are met. Obviously more than one technology can apply for a given set of fluid conditions.

 Where this occurs, the next step in narrowing down the selection choice is to calculate which one is likely to be able to help you save the most energy.

Why minimize energy?

Many flowmeter technologies introduce pressure loss into a system. Pressure losses equate to energy losses and costs. Valves, pipe friction, reducers, expanders, and measuring devices such as flowmeters all increase the Permanent Pressure Loss (PPL) in the system.

Some flowmeters require upstream reducers and downstream expanders to operate properly.

For new processes, engineers often consider PPL when designing a system because it's important in sizing the pump (liquids), compressor (gases), or boiler (steam) to meet process conditions and to deliver the desired pressure and/or flow. For operating processes, PPL leads directly to the need for compensating energy, which can equate to significant increased annual operating costs. By minimizing pressure losses in a process, engineers can cut the need for top-up pumping or compression as well as environmental impact. In the case of steam boilers, which are expensive, the ability to retrofit existing flowmeters with those having low pressure losses can boost the effective boiler capacity.

By selecting flowmeters with low pressure losses, engineers can:

• Reduce pumping/compressing cost
• Increase capacity
• Minimize compressor, pump or boiler size

The amount of pressure lost in a flowmeter depends on three factors: the fluid density, the square of the fluid velocity (Vf)2, and the degree of obstruction to fluid flow, (K). The following list roughly ranks the magnitude of the Kmeter factor for various flowmeters, from greatest pressure loss to lowest.

1. Coriolis
2. Orifice/Nozzle
3. Turbine
4. Vortex
5. Venturi
6. Averaging Pitot tube
7. Electromagnetic/Ultrasonic (negligible PPL)

Replacing an orifice plate with an averaging Pitot tube, for example, can reduce the permanent pressure loss (energy requirement) by a factor of 20. Averaging Pitot tubes offer minimal irrecoverable pressure losses as well as being inexpensive and simple to install.

Summary

With flowmeters normally being selected on their ability to provide accurate and reliable measurement, it can be easy to overlook the potential impact of the meter itself on the efficiency of a process line. With the impact of energy costs on the competitiveness of UK industrial companies, any step that can be taken to minimise energy consumption could provide a valuable first step towards enhanced profitability.

As a leading manufacturer and supplier of almost every type of flowmeter, ABB has the expertise and resources to help you make the best choice of device for your application. For advice or for more information, please email enquiries.mp.uk@gb.abb.com or call 0870 600 6122.