Disruption paradigm needed for social innovation

Disruption paradigm needed for social innovation

A new paradigm is evolving and it is a powerful force driving change in the way we solve complex problems. Startup and Tech have been moving to solve complex social problems because it is within our human nature to want the world to be a better place. Its surely time for the changemakers to unite and shift to collaborate for positive change?

I have spent 33 years searching for the holy grail of social change and I believe I found it a few years ago through tech and startup. I immersed myself in the ecosystem, attended every hackathon, event and coworking space in Sydney. I joined Fishburners and found a community of entrepreneurs who eagerly shared advice and gave support in those dark moments of self doubt. It was an experience that changed my life, it gave me a network of smart, driven people and access to a methodology that is desperately needed in government, NGOs and social change. It helped me design a journey map to social innovation which the key to shifting to a new paradigm to solve complex social problems.

A few years ago I started designing the collective model to engender collaboration across sectors and disciplines to solve social problems. The model is about building the capacity of all stakeholders to engage in the new paradigm for social change, provide the opportunities, networks, skills and resources to collaborate across sectors to solve seemingly intractable problems, leveraging our most important asset - our people, service users and staff. We need this approach now more than ever and I am very excited that Tracy Howe of NCOSS led the bid that won the tender for this work. The Collective Consortium is the new paradigm, it will build NGO, government and private sector capacity to collaborate for social change. It will act as a broker to showcase best practice and create opportunities for collaborating on some of the country's most complex problems. The Collective Consortium led by NCOSS and the formidable Tracy Howe, it will be launched at the upcoming Investing for Good conference and marketplace.

Connecting the dots

We need to redistribute and redirect resources and energy to public sector disruption and collaboration - its how we get shit done and stop the endless waste and procrastination resulting from holding on to a very broken system perpetuated by the status quo. This is what will allow our intrapreneurs to shine and break free of the shackles of an unyielding process driven system that is placing more and more people's lives at stake.

We are not quite there yet in Australia. While we are recognising that tech and startup are a key part of the innovation mindset, government is not shifting attention from the usual suspects of advisers and consultants to really look at the emerging socially minded ventures in the ecosystem doing it anyway.

There are an increasing number of startups emerging in social change, a number of these initiatives are disrupting the way we design services to empower people. WorkVentures, Young Change Agents, VibeWire, Random Hacks of Kindness, TechFugees, Indigenous startup weekend, AgriHack and WorkingSpacesHQ in Wagga are creating opportunities for people to develop ideas and find opportunities in tech and startup, crowdfunding platforms like StartSomeGood, Chuffed, Charidy, new philanthropy like 10x10 Philanthropy, or the incubators like Catalysr, all are specifically designed to disrupt how we solve social problems. There's also a huge desire from the likes of muru-D, Pollenizer, Blue Chilli, AcademyXi, Fishburners and Stone and Chalk to create the space for diversity and support social change initiatives.

The Alchemy of Collaboration

This is heartening but there remains a disconnect between those doing good across public and startup and tech sectors. My view is that innovation can only come from cross sector and cross discipline collaboration and that tech and startup is key to injecting a new method that is outcomes and impact driven, not process driven.

Process is what is stifling the creative process which is messy and uncharted but leads to new ways of tackling problems.

So how do we unleash the innovation mindset in our public servants when the bureaucracy is intrinsically driven by process ? How can we get the public servants together with the change makers in tech and startup and build their capacity to achieve outcomes and impact and inspire them to work differently? Is this even possible ?

Ben Hecht is the high priest of collaboration and has proven we can do better through his Living Cities initiatives sustained for almost a decade, I came across his work on collaboation in the Harvard Business Review in 2013 and have been a fan ever since. In a recent TEDxFargo talk, Ben Hecht CEO of Living Cities says the problem solving systems we are using are broken and we need to bring very different people together to big a different result." Hear Hear. This is the new paradigm that government needs to embrace. The success of Living Cities in shifting social disadvantage is in following these four steps

  1. Change the teams on the ground solving the problem
  2. Keep score - use data to track and measure progress in real time

3. Recalibrate resources to fund the initiatives that work

4. Build capacity of intrapreneurs, public service leaders to collaborate

Disruptive Social Innovation London style

In a recent trip to London I had the opportunity to become aware of initiatives creating opportunities for tech and startup to help government shift to the new paradigm - The Centre for Public Impact, Wayra Unlimited, GDS Academy and Cabinet Office Policy Camp are driving change. Concern about growing budgets, fewer sustainable outcomes and growing disadvantage is at the core of these initiatives, whether driven from public, private or startup they are raising the bar of how we work in delivering social change.

Thanks to Annie Parker I got to see the work of Wayra UK a startup incubator that is collaborating with councils to develop Digital Enterprise Hubs to inspire startups. Chelsea Pompadur of the Partnerships Team at WayraUK took the time to talk to me about the exciting Health initiative with Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited (MSD), a global healthcare company that is transforming healthcare through partnering with Wayra Open Future, Telefonica’s digital start up accelerator, by investing in digital innovation in healthcare. Velocity Health is that vehicle and the good news is startups from anywhere around the world can apply to improve patient outcomes.

I feel we have a longer way to go to get this level of private and government investment and collaboration. Our tardiness in getting on with it, and the obvious necessity to change the way we work together and solve complex problems, is to the detriment of people who are falling through the cracks of expensive and broken systems.

Meanwhile more recently in Australia, the Disruptors Handbook supported PharmHack and Johnson & Johnson Hatchathon and earlier this year Chronic Pain Australia ran the first hackathon for chronic pain, in these instances the disruption is coming from industry or community - definitely not government. I know our struggle with the Chronic Pain Hackathon was not getting the good ideas but rather in engaging the stakeholders that hold the needed funds to take the idea into reality. Prizes aside it takes a lot of effort and investment to bring it home after a hackathon.

In contrast, VelocityHealth promises to deliver the much needed incubation and funding that will make a difference to the startups it offers something tangible and sustainable- a prize of £64K half of which will be in the form of acceleration services, mentors, coashes and investors and office space within Wayra Open Future’s academy in Central London and potentially, and access to Telefonica’s customer base (over 300 million) and networks locally and globally. This is serious commitment to outcomes and I applaud the believers who made this happen.

Another great initiative was held this year in London, the Cabinet Office Policy School driven by the UK Cabinet office in collaboration with Telefonica Wayra is taking this business of innovation seriously:

"The government is taking meaningful steps to bring innovation into its ranks and leverage the start-up ecosystem to solve societal actual issues. The Policy School itself is a four-day event where teams try and solve issues with the local digital and entrepreneurship in mind. WayraUK entrepreneurs will be Involved by mentoring the teams." Cabinet Office Policy School

A team of bureaucrats spend 4 days in a location with entrepreneurs to solve a problem in a community. This is unbelievable and something I've wanted to do in Australia for some time, so seeing it happen and have it driven by government has inspired me to keep developing this concept. It is what I saw the Collective model being able to deliver with the added dimensions of community and citizen working with government, NGOs, startups and business to solve local problems, like Ben Hecht's Living Cities model.

The national Digital Academy run out of the Government Digital Service (GDS) is committed to transforming government services making them user centric and delivering services that are joined up and make life easier for citizens. Like the DTO, the GDS is building public sector capacity to leverage startup and digital disruption to improve service efficiency and delivery. The DTO's exemplars that have built the capacity of digital across agencies with an ambitious work program to deliver digital transformation while building sector capacity.

Centre for Public Impact (funded by Boston Consulting Group) has positioned itself in a way to be the broker between public policy and innovation, perhaps this is the middle way that shows a strong evidence base and gently takes the bureaucrats along on a journey of change. Executive Director Adrian Brown took some time to tell me what he is up to and some of the exciting initiatives the CPI Foundation is focusing on the outcomes and impact that matters. They do this by engaging with leaders, governments and organisations around the world and curating the best practice from around the world. See the short interview video of via my ChiefDisrupter Facebook page and be inspired to connect to the CPI Foundation.

One exciting initiative is the Mayors Challenge2016 in conjunction with Bloomberg Philanthropies in Latin America and the Carribean, seeks to unearth solutions to urban challenges. With hefty prizes of $US5million for the grand prize and an additional four $US1million for winning ideas to be implemented, this is attention to detail that we don's see in the same scale in Australia.

There is movement at the station in Australia too, in the last few weeks the Minister for Innovation Greg Hunt announced a $23million Incubator Support Initiative distributing grants of up to $500,000 for the creation of new incubators in regions or business sectors and to boost the effectiveness of high performing existing incubators, while Minister for Social Services, Christian Porter announced a Try Test and Learn Fund to develop and seek innovative responses to long teem unemployment and social disadvantage from government, NFP and the NGO sectors. Jobs NSW announced grants for promising startups and support for incubators and accelerators through its Minimum Viable Product Grants and Building Partnership Grants set to generate some new and exciting opportunities for the ecosystem to build and grow.

These government led initiatives are a good start and are certainly in the right direction but the devil is always in seeing who actually applies and gets access to these funds, here's hoping it will include a set of new players in the startup ecosystem and that some of the funded initiatives are the social innovation this country desperately needs.

Anne-Marie Elias is a speaker and consultant in collaboration, innovation, change and disruption. She is an honorary Associate of the Institute for Public Policy and Governance, UTS.

Anne-Marie is on the Board of VibeWire; Western Sydney Women; the Australian Open Knowledge Foundation; Autism Advisory Board, and the Settlement Services International Foundation.

Follow Anne-Marie's  journey of disruption and innovation on Twitter@ChiefDisrupter or visit www.chiefdisrupter.com and anne-marieelis.com

Mathieu Ajan

BFI NETWORK Executive & Founder: Bounce Cinema

6y

Great article!

Brian Atkin

Energy transition | Digital leadership | Cacao social entrepreneur

7y

What an excellent article! As you point out there are a number of different approaches that seem to be coming together in the public sector to create social impact and change - lean startup and design thinking which are front and centre in the innovation agenda; digital transformation which has its roots in seamless and optimal customer experience which also drives internal efficiencies; now also social entrepreneurship and impact investment. These are all different levers that public sector agencies need to use to create real social impact. What is also fascinating to me is the convergence of these levers both within first world government and also with government aid budgets for the third world. I have worked within public sector innovation/public sector digital transformation in Australia and also in running my own private social enterprise in the third world. Where these were quite distinct activities previously they are starting to come together as foreign aid officials start to realise the value of approaches like lean startup, design thinking and impact investment in creating social change in the third world.

Filippo Vasta

Management Scientist with focus on Quantitative methods, owner MbyM srl - Cofounder Pieveschool

7y

I believe today the key issue is there is virtually zero social innovation in a world where all other field are innovating at a crazy pace. Probably "social sciencies" is a relatively young discipline mainly biased towards a humanistic back-ground and there are no profiles (professors , researchers) adequate to face the complexities and intricacies of the governance of the modern world. A new social discipline needs to be quickly framed, probably integrating multiple competencies and sciencies such as: system dynamics, neural networks, goal seeking, group theory and a new approach to sovereign monetary policy like the ideas of J.D. Alt in his fascinating "Diagrams and Dollars". Morale: let's slow down a bit technology innovation and let's accelerate tremendously social innovation always keeping in mind that respect for human being must be always at the heart of every policy

Sam Rye

Strategy, research & collaboration for complex challenges

7y

Hey Anne-Marie, this is interesting to read, and a good synthesis of a variety of different change/innovation initiatives across the world. It feels like there's a few things missing from most of the initiatives you've pointed to, one of which I would suggest is power, and the other of which is the recognition of the system dynamics at play (these are obviously linked as well). I would invite you to take a look at Social Labs as another area which you should take more of a look at. There's a good talk from the author of Social Labs Revolution, Zaid Hassan here: https://youtu.be/f3Siqovj-RY What I'm seeing in this post, is about the range of initiatives which are breaking down the traditional planning-based approach to change - whether you want to call it 'disruptive', 'innovation', 'startup', 'intrapreneurship' or the likes, I'm noticing that most of the initiatives you've pointed towards are more Participative in their approach, more cyclical in their design methods, and more likely to dedicate to smaller amounts of funding towards initiatives which are likely to have sprung from outside of Government. In this case, I would also be interested in your thoughts on how to manage the ethics, rigour and quality of extra-Government initiatives, especially with a lens on how to ensure services designed with a wide spread of the population in mind. The extreme end of the stick is obviously the challenges of the likes Silicon Valley is seeing with services being designed and sold into Government, by bro-culture companies, which aren't actually serving the needs of a significant part of the community. Just some thoughts, and really appreciating your sharing of your journey :)

Charles Gabriel

Digital Advertising Sales Leader

7y

Agree with most...think you will find that NGO's are part of the problem...highly recommend watching the doc Poverty Inc.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics