Elsevier

Journal of Veterinary Behavior

Volume 8, Issue 3, May–June 2013, Pages 154-161
Journal of Veterinary Behavior

Research
The effectiveness of the Anxiety Wrap in the treatment of canine thunderstorm phobia: An open-label trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2012.09.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The effectiveness of the Anxiety Wrap on canine thunderstorm phobia (ThP) was investigated by comparing owner-reported Thunderstorm Anxiety Scores before and after the use of this product (n = 18). The mean Thunderstorm Anxiety Score associated with the fifth use of the Anxiety Wrap was 47% lower than the mean anxiety score that was generated before the use of the Anxiety Wrap (P = 0.001). After 5 uses of the Anxiety Wrap, 89% of owners reported that it was at least partially effective in treating their dogs' ThP, and this percentage was significantly higher than those who rated it as noneffective (χ2 = 11.842, n = 19, P = 0.001). Eighty percent of the owners reported that they would continue to use the Anxiety Wrap for their dogs' ThP after the trial, and no owners reported any negative side effects from the use of this product. The data suggest that the Anxiety Wrap is a safe and effective treatment for canine ThP.

Introduction

Canine thunderstorm phobia (ThP) is a condition that can result in hardship for both owners and dogs. Affected dogs display symptoms that can include panting, pacing, owner seeking, hiding, escaping attempts from crates (or even the home itself), inappropriate elimination, and vocalization (McCobb et al., 2001). Although there are efficacious pharmacological treatments for canine ThP (Crowell-Davis et al., 2003), not all owners want to rely on using medication. One nonpharmacological treatment option, Storm Defender, which has supposed antistatic properties, was already tested and found to be efficacious (Cottam and Dodman, 2009), but an additional efficacious nonpharmacological treatment for this condition would provide yet another option.

The Anxiety Wrap (Animals Plus LLC, Huntington, IN) is a product designed to apply pressure to a dog's torso, while allowing the dog to engage in unencumbered movement. The inventor of the Anxiety Wrap claims that the product reduces fear by 2 pressure-inducing methods: maintained pressure “swaddling” and acupressure. There is some evidence to suggest that tactile pressure produces a calming effect in humans (Blairs et al., 2007), pigs (Grandin et al., 1989), and dogs (Williams et al., 2003). The methods used to exert tactile pressure in these studies, and the degree to which these methods restrict movement, varied according to the pressure delivery system used (i.e., bed tuck-ins for humans, squeeze machine for pigs, and a grain-filled box for dogs). The amount of tactile pressure necessary to engender a calming effect in various species (with or without movement restriction) varies with the method used to induce tactile pressure. In an exploratory study on the effectiveness of deep pressure stimulation, a 30 pound weighted blanket was used to induce a calming effect on prone adult humans (Mullen et al., 2008), and Grandin's renowned squeeze machine delivers 60 psi or 95 pounds of air pressure (Grandin, 1992).

Anecdotal evidence suggests that the use of the Anxiety Wrap can reduce canine fear-related behaviors; however, it has not been scientifically tested for effectiveness. This open-label trial was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Anxiety Wrap in treating canine ThP.

Section snippets

Participants and animals

The protocol for this study was approved by the Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine's (TCSVM) Clinical Research Studies Committee (North Grafton, MA, USA). Subjects were found by placing an advertisement in one of the TCSVM's newsletters, Your Dog, in March 2010. Owners of thunderstorm wary dogs, living in 11 states with a high prevalence of thunderstorms (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Tennessee), were asked

Response rate

Twenty-one owners returned their TP and post-TP surveys by the end of the 2010 thunderstorm season. Of the 5 owners who did not return their surveys, one owner did not respond to follow-up communications, one dropped out because of a medical illness, one owner feared that her dog would be aggressive if she tried to fit the Anxiety Wrap, one owner thought her Anxiety Wrap was of the wrong size and did not use it, and one dropped out but did not give a reason.

Of the 21 owners who recorded their

Discussion

This open-label trial provides evidence that the use of the Anxiety Wrap can be effective in treating canine ThP. The mean TAS associated with the fifth recorded use of this product decreased by 47% from baseline, which could indicate an almost 50% decrease in the intensity, frequency, or duration of clinical signs associated with ThP. Eighty-nine percent of owners (17/19) reported that the Anxiety Wrap was effective to some extent in treating their dogs' ThP. No negative side effects were

Conclusion

These results provide evidence that the Anxiety Wrap is therapeutic for canine ThP and reduces the severity of clinical signs by almost 50%. No negative side effects were reported with the use of this product.

Acknowledgment

Twenty-six Anxiety Wraps were donated by the manufacturer (Animals Plus LLC, Huntington, IN) for use in this study, and salary support for the lead authors' time to collect and analyze the data was provided by Animals Plus LLC.

The sponsors of this study (manufacturers of the Anxiety Wrap) were involved neither in designing the specific protocols for this research study nor in collecting or analyzing the data.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • The use of trazodone to facilitate calm behavior after elective orthopedic surgery in dogs: Results and lessons learned from a clinical trial

    2017, Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the placebo-by-proxy effect, the belief of the owners that their dog is receiving a medication that facilitates calm behavior could change the way that the owner interacts with the dog and could lead to an actual change in the dog's behavior because of this interaction. Although not called by the same term, this idea was also discussed in a study by Cottam et al. (2013) that evaluated the efficacy of an antistatic cape for the treatment of thunderstorm anxiety in dogs. In that study, both the lined cape and the unlined (placebo) cape resulted in improvement on a global assessment of dogs' behavior.

  • The effect of a pressure vest on the behaviour, salivary cortisol and urine oxytocin of noise phobic dogs in a controlled test

    2016, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    According to some owners (results not reported), their dogs did not react similarly in our artificial tests situation compared with real thunder/fireworks (i.e. were not fearful), suggesting that these dogs might have not experienced this situation as “real”. However, as owners hoping for help for their dogs might over interpret changes in the doǵs behaviour due to the vest (Cottam et al., 2013), and as owners might not always recognize subtle signs of stress (Maritia et al., 2012), recordings in the home-environment should be objective and preferably blinded. Noise phobia is a very heterogeneous symptom, with dogs reacting to various sounds, and with a large range of severity (Storengen and Lingaas, 2015).

  • Phenotypic determination of noise reactivity in 3 breeds of working dogs: A cautionary tale of age, breed, behavioral assessment, and genetics

    2016, Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Dogs exhibiting these anxious and panicky signs in response to a noise stimulus experience both physical and behavioral debility and compromise (Dykman et al., 1966; Murphree et al., 1967; Overall et al., 2001; Dreschel and Granger, 2005; Dreschel, 2010; Siniscalchi et al., 2013). Noise reactivity and phobia interferes with performance in working dogs (Tomkins et al., 2011, 2012; Gazzano et al., 2007; Batt et al., 2008; Asher et al., 2013; Burghardt, 2013; Arvelius et al., 2014; Sherman et al., 2014; Evans et al., 2015) and interferes routine patterns of daily life in pet dogs (Overall et al., 2001; Crowell-Davis et al., 2003; Gruen and Sherman, 2008; Cottam et al., 2013). Noise reactivity and phobia is associated with patterns of brain organization (Branson and Rogers, 2006; Francks et al., 2007; Siniscalchi et al., 2008; Foler et al., 2011), which may be one mechanism through which pathologic changes occur.

  • Is noise reactivity reflected in auditory response variables, including those that measure cognition, in dogs? Initial findings

    2016, Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Treatment for noise reactivity and phobia focuses on redress of the associated behavioral and physiological signs. Interventions shown to be efficacious include avoidance, behavioral modification (Tuber et al., 1982; Shull-Selcer and Stagg, 1991), application of gentle pressure (Cottam et al., 2013), and medication Seksel and Lindemann, 2001; Crowell-Davis et al., 2003; Gruen and Sherman, 2008; Ogata and Dodman, 2011). There are no studies investigating whether any aspect of auditory acuity and ability is related to measurable aspects of noise reactivity and phobia.

  • An open-label prospective study of the use of l-theanine (Anxitane) in storm-sensitive client-owned dogs

    2015, Journal of Veterinary Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the recommendation of behavioral and environmental procedures without recording their use is comparable to other clinical trials that combine medication, behavior modification, and management (Crowell-Davis et al., 2003; Cracknell and Mills, 2008; Gruen and Sherman, 2008; Herron et al., 2008; Ibanez and Anzola, 2009; Ogata and Dodman, 2011). One study has shown no statistically significant difference between dogs whose owners interacted with them during a storm and those that did not (Cottam et al., 2013). There was 1 possible adverse event during the trial in which 1 subject demonstrated increased anxiety (trembling and refusal to come inside the house) during the first thunderstorm experienced after the first dose of the test article had been administered.

  • Canine aggression toward people: A guide for practitioners

    2014, Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text