Duchess Kate’s big new solo campaign will be about the children of ‘Broken Britain’

Kate RCOG visit

After the Duchess of Cambridge’s Don’t Forget About Me Tour earlier this year, I sort of assumed that she would follow through with it and “come back” from her maternity leave pretty soon. She did not – she hasn’t done any public events since Wimbledon. The rumor is that Kate will still be on maternity leave through September, and then she’ll make a couple of appearances in October, then she’ll probably do a rush of activities to get her numbers up in November and December. So what can we expect of Kate when she does come back to a public schedule? Buttons, I would assume. But what ELSE? As it turns out, Kate is keen to focus on the children of “Broken Britain.”

The Duchess of Cambridge is launching a campaign to help children failed by ‘Broken Britain’. Kate believes the right support, from birth, can help disadvantaged youngsters reach their potential. She is bringing together experts from academia, education, health and other fields to work on how to help families tackle anti-social behaviour, addiction and mental health. The subject is politically fraught, with some blaming Broken Britain on parents and others blaming budget cuts. But sources say the 36-year-old duchess is determined to push ahead because she sees it as potentially as big an issue as climate change.

‘This is a lifelong project,’ said one royal source. ‘She is looking at what she can do over the next five, ten, 15, 20 years. She wants to be able to look back and see what difference has been made. That’s what her position in public life allows her to do.’

Researchers have highlighted the importance of early intervention and how children from disadvantaged backgrounds who do not receive the right help at school age can suffer lifelong problems. Education secretary Damian Hinds and Ofsted chief Amanda Spielman have both spoken recently of the need to help children who are not taught basic skills by their parents. If youngsters have limited vocabulary and are not toilet-trained when they start school, they are already behind their peers and many never catch up.

The duchess’s initiative, which will be launched in the new year, is a major solo move. Until now she has worked on campaigns alongside her husband William and brother-in-law Harry. By seizing on an issue she wants to campaign about for the rest of her life, she is following in the footsteps of Prince Charles’s decades-long campaign to highlight environmental issues. She insists she will steer clear of public policy, instead using her ‘convening power’ to bring together experts, charities and academics in the field under the umbrella of the Royal Foundation, the charity for the younger royals. The findings will be published by Kensington Palace next year.

[From The Daily Mail]

Don’t get me wrong, I think Kate could and should do a big issue campaign like this. I’ve thought that for some time, because she’s needed a big-issue campaign for years. But she was too busy going on holidays and getting her hair done in previous years. What concerns me is the same thing that concerns me about Heads Together: the issues of “mental health” and “early childhood education” are very important, and it’s important to have nuanced, high-level conversations about those subjects. Is Kate capable of that kind of nuance? Is William? Is Harry? Because I’m not entirely sure they are. It feels like Kate is just looking for something “soft” where she can do a lot of photo-ops with kids and have her staff ghostwrite some well-meaning letters on her behalf… which actually describes a lot of her “work” thus far on the children’s charities she already works with.

The Duke and Duchess attend a SportsAid event at the Copper Box in the Olympic Park

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge visit the Fire Station Arts Centre in Sunderland

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

146 Responses to “Duchess Kate’s big new solo campaign will be about the children of ‘Broken Britain’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Flying fish says:

    This announcement and Meghan’s should identify why M&H need a separate press office from W&K.

    • Eliza says:

      I read about Kate’s on Friday, Meghan’s today. Still way too close. Also announcing initiatives on Friday’s means it’s buried in the weekends news. Their office is so inept.

      • Belluga says:

        From the same press office? That sounds almost preemptive.

      • Birdy says:

        And it was harry’s birthday in the past few days as well.

      • Morning Coffee says:

        Not to mention the notion of “Broken Britain.” That reminds me of Jimmy Carter’s “malaise” statement. Does the UK really want the future Queen talking about broken Britain? Is Britain broken? Words mean things, and these words are just bad. Very, very bad. Now, I’m off to buy Meghan’s cookbook!

      • Lady D says:

        I thought broken was a bad choice for a descriptive word, too.

      • Natalie S says:

        And considering the lack of details in the article besides that they’re publishing their findings in 2019, this could have waited at least one week. But it does seems to have been leaked rather than officially released.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Yes, I’ve been saying that for months. I’m calling that the Cambridges drop something big when H&M are on their first tour.

    • Nic919 says:

      This was never announced by KP though. It’s the Daily Mail that made this a story. So why would the Daily Mail have pretty detailed information about something not yet announced just a few days before Meghan’s cookbook is actually announced. Why would KP leak this kind of information?

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        The Fail is a long term Cambridge/Middleton mouth piece. It was leaked to them by someone in that camp.

      • notasugarhere says:

        As LAK detailed several times, the Middletons have hired PR consultants through the years. One of those hired PR hacks is the immediate past editor of the Sunday DM, another is the brand new editor of the Sunday DM.

      • Natalie S says:

        Don’t Forget About Meeeee…..

        But it looks like the Daily Mail may have done a bit of trolling by linking the initiative with the politically charged label Broken Britain. I don’t know if the leaker wanted that. These are strange times though politically so I could be wrong.

      • PrincessK says:

        Yes, very odd. It is definitely a tactic to keep Kate in the news.

    • PrincessK says:

      I felt that this sudden announcement from Kate’s people about her new first solo initiative sounded rather odd and ill timed. It should have been quickly followed by us seeing Kate do something in relation to this new project. I also felt that Meghan is not yet allowed to hit the ground running for fear of upstaging Kate. It is very surprising that Kate now has her first solo charity after seven whole year of being a member of the RF. Meghan probably has solo charities to support already lined up and waiting for her but she will never be allowed to outshine or outwork Kate, so they have to hold Meghan back and get Kate going first.

      But now I can see that this Kate story was rushed out before the announcement of the Meghan related cookbook. It is all about trying to make sure that Meghan does not out shine Kate totally. We are going to see more of these tactics.

      • Natalie S says:

        And that’s why I’ve been so cynical about this story.

        Meghan found a way around that though, didn’t she? Just keep meeting with people even if it doesn’t count as an official engagement and then show the public the results. Harry did a similar thing when he was getting Invictus off the ground.

        I wonder how Harry feels about all this. It’s one thing when it’s happening to you and another thing entirely when it’s happening to someone you love.

      • Addie says:

        Yep. You’re absolutely right. Thing is, KP has put out Katie keen comments year after year and nothing changes. The woman. just. won’t. work. That leaves Meghan in a difficult spot if she wants to get things done but the name of the game is to let the lazy Cambridge’s shine.

    • Royalsparkle says:

      +1000
      Totally agree!

      Back in Nov in time to retire for the Holidays at A/ Hall

      The solo is so Very Negative and again, out of touch. Will waity Cannot and Willnot Lambridge ever care to learn of the people who support their entitlement luxury lifestyle – for this family of five (5) plus middletons in laws. ..

  2. OriginalLala says:

    I dunno…anytime the palace announces a new initiative for Kate, all is boils down to are a few photo ops and then no real follow through (see: most of her patronages)

    • Natalie S says:

      At this point Kate is the girl who cried keen. Who knows what the actual follow through will be?

      But it’s big and splashy with very few details. Also this came out over the weekend and now on Monday, we hear about Meghan’s cookbook. Hmmm.

      • OriginalLala says:

        haha she is the girl who cried keen! we’ve seen this before – a big announcement, maybe a visit and then nothing..but she is always oh so keen!

      • Renee2 says:

        Thanks for providing my first laugh of the day!! The woman who cried keen, indeed.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Very very true – am sure we’ll get the same cut and pasted speeches she’s given before basically saying that single and working parents are to blame for their kids problems before doing a drive by – turn up late, spend 10 mins for a few photo’s ops and the spend the rest of the day shopping down Kings Road. Am sure we all remember the day she guest edited HuffPo from KP.

      • Reese says:

        I am the first to slag Kate, however, if you can deny the impact of her and Heads Together on the issue of mental health in England you are living with your head buried in the sand.
        I’m not saying she is the most intelligent women up for the task but I don’t believe that to be her role. Kate has shone such an important light on mental health surrounding children in the UK, there was a dim spotlight before her.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Kate “shining a light” by saying that children from loving families do not develop mental health issues. She has been in over her head from day one in the co-opted “Harry’s doing great work with veteran mental health, let’s get W&K on the bandwagon”.

      • Reese says:

        You can nitpick Kate’s statements to death to prove a useless point. I never said she was bright, I said she and Heads Together has made a impact on the way the public views mental health issues in the UK.
        Working in the mental health field for NHS, I am able to see first hand how the perception of the general public has shifted in regards metal health issues. Stigmas are shifting, especially around the need for children to get early intervention to prevent more serious complications later on in life.

      • Natalie S says:

        @Reese. No one is against raising awareness for mental health issues. The point is what is going to happen in terms of consistent action for funding and support.

        After awareness, you need follow-through and Kate has shown a lack of consistent follow-through on anything not related to her personal life or her appearance. This huge initiative is going to be her responsibility and at this point it is valid to question what is actually going to happen.

        I have my doubts that we’re not going to hear for the next year or so that Kate can’t do more engagements because she’s actually working behind the scenes on her new initiative. The committee is publishing their findings in 2019 and then we’ll wait for what action Kate actually takes. Kate doesn’t have to be brilliant, she just has to be consistent and so far she isn’t.

        Overall, this sounds similar to stories in 2011 on how Kate was doing so much research before picking her charities.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Making a negative impact in the face of the work experts have done for years is not a positive thing, Reese.

      • Reese says:

        You are talking directly to me in this statement and my work and no she absolutely did not make a negative impact on mental health in the UK just the opposite.
        It’s becoming pointless to argue with you as you appear to be a Kate maligner and regardless of any good she has done it won’t matter to you.
        You and I always disagree about the BRF and you know I’m the first one to slag on Kate or any royal. I don’t apologise for my views of what I believe to be Kate’s lack of work ethic and how my hard earned money funds so much of her nonsense.
        Kate’s role is not to lead substantial discussions or come up with solutions to a mental health crisis. When I first left school and began working you could access all the help you needed in my field. Today, if you have an adolescent in crisis you are going to need to be patient and wait. We do not have more children or adolescents in need in the UK than years ago, there are simply more people reaching out for help as the barriers and stigmas are slowly being broken down.
        One of the more common I things I hear in interviews with parents are things like, heads together made me think my child needed or seeing Kate talk about, or seeing William, Harry or Kate blah blah blah.
        If Kate taking two minutes from a shopping trip to put one shed of light on a previous dark subject and helped bring it into the mainstream then I’m going to defend her for that. Unbelievably so, I know hypocrital of me since I don’t historically say anything nice about her. But there it is.

      • Maria says:

        +1 Reese

      • notasugarhere says:

        Yes, Reese, she did. Professionals, experts, the people who are trained and who know what they are doing? They have been fighting those stereotypes and fallacies for decades. Decades. And in her first speech Kate comes out swinging with comments that undermined that work. Plenty of articles followed trying to clean it up, but the damage was done.

        A very crucial part of her role is not to do harm. She failed at that.

        Like her all you want but please do not pretend that her idiocy doesn’t have consequences. That is why their attempts to find something, anything for her to hang her hat on have to be done carefully. These issues are too big and important for her to be anywhere near them.

      • Reese says:

        So now you’re getting personal saying I don’t know what I’m doing or talking about in regards to my own profession? The one area where I studied and work and actually see what’s going in the UK when it comes to mental health?
        Jesus get a grip on your hate for Kate. You’ve shown your true colours here. You are not able to have a rational discussion.
        You have zero idea what you’re talking about and I’ve absolutely just cancelled you. Spew all the garbage you want. I’m out.

      • whywhywhy says:

        @reese

        All your comments today have been great and rational; I’ve enjoyed reading them!

      • notasugarhere says:

        I am stating, logically, that you are one voice. One. You are not the only professional in this field. Plenty of professionals in this field were, and continue to be, horrified by Kate’s dilettante mistakes.

      • Reese says:

        “Professionals, experts, the people who are trained and who know what they are doing?”
        Is a personal attack against me that’s childish and insulting and shows that when you can’t come up with a susbtantial rebuttal you go to low slinging attacks.
        I am not ONE voice. I am actually the voice of many. When you work in a profession you actually get to work along side other professionals, imagine that? My colleagues and peers have also seen the positive change that the Heads Together movement has brought to our field. I’ve given you examples of clients and patients who have felt more comfortable coming forward after hearing Kate, William or Harry speak (I’m looking forward to hearing MM to the list) they are also voices. Their opinions and stories also matter.
        So you see I’m not ONE voice. I represent the voices of many. All of which you refuse to see beyond your own ignorance. Kate Middleton, love or hate her, has not made a negative impact on mental health in the UK. Any stupid mistake on her part has been overshadowed by the outpouring of awareness her presence and the presence of Heads Together has made of breaking down barriers and stigmas surrounding mental health.

      • Fafette says:

        Wow, notasugar, you are way out of line. Get a grip.

      • BCity says:

        The girl who cried keen 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Y’all ain’t sh*t 😁😁😁

      • Nic919 says:

        Funny how some of these same people so worried about feminists are slagging off Meghan in the post about her cook book.

      • Princessk says:

        @Reese….l agree with you. Also Kate doesn’t appear be a natural people person, and she can’t help that. I remember when she was dating William people said that her more outgoing gregarious younger sister would have been better choice for the public role of Queen Consort.

    • Agenbiter says:

      But Kate’s so great with kids!

      Did you know that she’s a supermom to three kids herself?

      • Agenbiter says:

        At least that’s what I hear from the Daily Hell (thanks for that) comments …

      • Mrs.Krabapple says:

        There are many photos of Kate with children (not her own), and the kids are barely look at her. She may be a great parent to her own kids, but she doesn’t seem capable of engaging with anyone else’s children. So why pick children as a target of her charity work? Probably because the misogynistic royal family thinks that’s “suitable” for a woman. But I’m American so it’s really none of my business.

      • Royalsparkle says:

        HA!!!
        And dear keen waity, was great with her pals in uni – strutting down the catwalk in her undies, sports – showing her bits in and out of nightclubs/cars and family vacations on royal yachts …

    • Honey says:

      They are playing the long game on this one. Kate will become Queen Consort. She needs an initiative, a signature project, like this to define her and to solely associate with as she matures as moves through the years and decades. Think Queen Sylvia of Sweden and her projects around children.

      Here is where LAK or NotaSugar is needed for their recall of exact details. Some years ago, Charles arranged for a mature, experienced woman who ran one of the schools at Oxford to be Kate’s secretary. She took on the role that Rebecca English had. Ever since she came aboard Kate hasn’t necessarily been as keen but she shows up looking more mature, less juvenile and more so like a professional person.

      • Lexa says:

        I’ve never heard that Charles is responsible for Catherine Quinn being hired. I think you might be thinking of Rebecca Deacon, though—Rebecca English is a royal reporter.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Am all for Katie Keen to have a signature cause but as others have said it needs to be more than the occasional speech and drive-by photo opportunity. She needs to be consistent in the follow ups and just generally be more involved and engaged than she currently has been. If this is something that she is interested in then she really needs to put on her big girl panties and get stuck in – its a complex area and she needs to tread carefully to help break down barriers and educate people on it without setting things back. A lot has been done over the past several years to break down the barriers, popular and primetime TV shows that feature this in their storylines have had an impact and the various suicides of high profile musicians and entertainers has made people take notice.

        When it comes to Mental Health; William, Harry and Meghan will do well with it, as given their backgrounds they have direct experience of it (Meghan in dealing with her father/family, the Princes with their mothers death) and can relate (which goes a long way when working with troubled people – I have been there and it helps that someone understands where you’re at). Kate has lived her life in a bubble, protected by a helicopter/tiger mother – she struggles to relate and it shows.

        @Lexa – Charles was behind the hiring of Catherine Quinn, he recommended her as I believe he had worked with her before. And yes Kate does seem more professionally turned out since she arrived – she hasn’t flashed her knickers at us in a while.

      • Nic919 says:

        She has always shown more interest in sports related events so I don’t know why she doesn’t try to focus on something relating to that area, like perhaps working on sports programs for kids in underserved areas. Although it is the Daily Mail and thus unreliable, if fixing broken Britain is something she really is doing, it seems as vague as when we were told that Kushner was going to solve the Middle East. And why not just keep going on the mental health issue? There is a dilettantism about her projects for the last 7 going on 8 years which is why she is not taken seriously.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        @Nic919 – I think Kate taking on sport as a way to help disadvantages kids who suffer from mental health issues would be a great thing for her. As you say always seems more interested in sport related events – I know several people who use sport and physical exercise to help them manage their depression and anxiety. If it works for adults am sure it would do great things for kids.

      • Killjoy says:

        In response to Digital Unicorn – Serious mental illnesses, and common mental health issues, like anxiety and depression often exist separately from traumatic incidents like the death of a parent during childhood, or dealing with a difficult relative. Most of us will need to deal with stressors and grief during our lives — indeed, if we’re lucky, our parents will die before us. That’s not to downplay Harry and Will’s contributions to working through their grief, but it’s actually *not* considered a mental health “problem” to process grief. TLDR: Kate certainly could recognize and talk about the stigma of mental health issues without dealing with an obvious stressor.

      • Derriere says:

        Can we just be honest here. Harry has set up Invictus and Sentebale (sp?) albeit with loads of help and has succeeded in creating those organizations because they are SPECIFIC. We know the mission and how it will be accomplished.

        Can Kate stop with these…awareness campaigns? Because we get it: she shows up in a cute outfit with buttons, we talk about wherever she was and briefly what the event was about, and now an organization has gained it’s 2 minutes of fame before she disappears again.

        Like others have said…if she wants to help the children of “Broken Britain” (who came up with this name?!!!), why not pick a specific issue? These children don’t have access to what exactly? What do they need? What will be done to get it? Is it the arts? Education? Athletic training? Clothing? Food? Coding? Ballet? I mean…who is working there? They are overpaid to churn out dribble like this.

      • notasugarhere says:

        One of the big problems in this is that Kate and William conflate mental health issues with everyday challenges in life. That was obvious in the stilted picnic table “discussion”, where their permanent adolescent mindset came through loud and clear.

      • Agenbiter says:

        Agree 100% that this is a bizarre and ineffectual choice of cause – blargh to ‘awareness campaigns’ in general!

        As was suggested, why not a sports-related charity for underserved kids so she could actually shine in an area she has always loved? Are those advising her so oblivious they can’t see what we all see? Or is W so sinister he doesn’t want her to have a cause that would show her at her best?

    • Mee says:

      Exactly this will be just photo ops. Kate has never worked a real job. It’s not like she graduated college and worked for someone and had tangible accountability. I’ve always thought her and Will just want to go off and live in the country with their kids. They are both not interested in ‘working’. But here comes Harry and Meghan to f things up for them loll

      • Royalsparkle says:

        +1

        Seven plus years and counting – three babies …. Dear keen seem to not care about the people paying her way – nor care to learn – listen – interact beneath her status.

  3. Belluga says:

    I’m bored of “William/Kate is totally going to get started on something big next year, guys”. It’s been 7 years of this. Just get on with it and show us the results. Actions vs words, people!

    William at least seems to have received a kick up the backside very recently, let’s hope it lasts and that Kate follows suit

    • Eliza says:

      I hope she will. I think she paces herself by Williams example: as he’s been busier I think she will too.

      Right now i hope she’s enjoying her babies; and bonding. I wish US had better maternity leave. I wish I had 6 months! Hell I wish I had 4! I took 10 weeks.

      • Belluga says:

        I hope so too. She was out and about a little more before Louis was born, so fingers crossed. I want her to pick a project and stick with it, instead of making lofty announcements of future intentions that then don’t materialise. (Looking at the photo in this page, whatever’s happened with her focus on nursing?)

        I definitely don’t begrudge her maternity leave, but I’d like it if there was a noticeable difference between “on leave Kate” and “not on leave Kate”

      • Anitas says:

        10 weeks 🙁 I’m sorry Eliza. US maternity laws are inhumane.

      • Sunnee says:

        Not all of the US is backward when it comes to maternity leave. Here in Northern California we get 4-6 months of maternity leave. Our leave is supplemented by PFL. I got four months when I had my son who is now 16, but my co-workers are extending it for up to 6 months.

    • LANYCgo says:

      Keen Kate,is coming back to work just in time for the Big Dress Up Tiara Royal State Dinner with King and Queen of the Netherlands.
      Yawn another car ride to the dinner with William gritting his teeth and clenched jaw and Kate wearing a tiara looking out of the window with bored eyes and smile.
      How many years did the PR say Kate was going “To hit the Ground Running” 7 years!?

      Kate got what she wanted and IMO knows that ,no matter what, the U.K. Press will find a way to praise her and build her up.
      I noticed Sophie Countess of Wessex, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Princess Anne, all just Work.., they get out their and work, no constant drip, drip, drip about what they are going to do one day.m

      Kate is lazy IMO. She loves the comforts but not the duties of the work,so much.

      • Royalsparkle says:

        +1000
        Amen @ LANYCgo!!

        Lets hope HM POW, the government / powers that be – RF take note of this lazy marry in..

        KK makes us hardworking, professional women mothers – feel shame, considering where she came…

        More Positive News on Duke/ess Henry Sussexs: HRH Sussexs will be hosting a Book Party, Thu, Sep 20.

  4. Citresse says:

    Can we start the Broken Britain by getting the real numbers and the final stop of money shuffle on refurbished properties occupied by the Cambridges????

    • Natalie S says:

      Broken Britain from someone who lives off the taxpayers. The name is such a bad idea. It is so unnecessarily negative. Heads Together is cute and fun and upbeat. Broken Britain is weirdly shaming. Is that a Daily Mail thing or from the royals?

      • Belluga says:

        Broken Britain is a term that has been in use for a while, mostly by the Tories and Tory papers and it is absolutely intended to be shaming. It’s an oddly political term to use since we’ve had it banged into our heads recently that royals can’t be political, and not a pleasant one.

      • Natalie S says:

        That is so weird. We’ve seen before that the Cambridges can get the Daily Mail to change an article (pulling the Christmas photos). Either the courtiers didn’t complain or the Daily Mail refused to change anything.

      • Sofia says:

        Maybe Kate is taking advice from the same person who came up with the name of Melania’s “Be Best” initiative.

      • Who ARE these people? says:

        Not British but really struck by this awful name. If it’s a Tory catchphrase then it’s a truly insensitive choice. It seems to imply that Britain is broken because poor people are bad … bad parents, bad everything … and they broke Britain not Tory policies an Brexit. Is it the Tory MAGA?

      • Mego says:

        @Sophia, weirdbut when I read about this I thought of Melania Trump too lol!

      • Belluga says:

        @WATP – It was used more when they weren’t in power, iirc because they used to use it to hound the Labour goverent. But it’s still used now and with implications of “these poor people and immigrants are ruining British society”. So you’ve pretty much summed it up. It’s kinda like MAGA, yes.

      • Citresse says:

        They should rename to Broken and Disrepair. Homeless rates are very rapidly climbing in all major cities in G7.

      • Meganbot2000 says:

        Broken Britain is a very old, very well-established term (like “the Great Depression”). Kate didn’t just invent it!

  5. Jess says:

    The things Kate has stated during the Heads Together campaign was so problematic (“Since beginning my work in areas like addiction, for example, I have seen time and time again that the roots of poor mental health in adulthood are almost always present in unresolved childhood challenges”). Im really hoping this will turn out to be a productive and impactful charity.

    • Who ARE These People? says:

      You can have the happiest of childhoods and still suffer from trauma in adolescence or adulthood, experience a schizophrenic breakdown or simply have a vulnerable temperament. Happy, well-resourced childhoods help build resilience but that applies across social classes and the emphasis from anyone connected to the ability to hand out the dollars should be focusing on “well resourced.”

      • Jess says:

        Exactly.

        The speeches she had for Heads Together was harmful and perpetuates the stereotypes associated with mental health instead.

  6. Swack says:

    Melania 2.0

  7. Alexandria says:

    Lifelong like the Prince’s Trust? Good on her. We shall see.

  8. Skylark says:

    I think the clear difference between Kate and Meghan is that Meghan has passions, ones she’s clearly had for years, so it’s relatively easy for her to pinpoint the causes/areas she feels will benefit most and best from her high profile, and why she comes across as genuinely invested in what she takes on. Kate, by contrast, doesn’t seem to have any real passions, hence the constant need by her PR to find things for her to be passionate about.

    If the passion is manufactured, then it becomes all effort which, unfortunately, is what most of her patronages comes across as.

    • Alexandria says:

      And Meghan can’t coast on white mediocrity. She always has to do more to prove herself. Anyway I will be positive. William seems to be doing more and Kate takes his cue. Let’s see.

    • StartupSpouse says:

      You nailed it. If Kate didn’t marry William, is this a cause that she would be focused on? Is this how she would spend her free time? I want to give her the benefit of the doubt, but I don’t think so. It’s manufactured. Now compare that to Meghan, who we know spent her free time championing women’s issues before she even knew Harry.

      • Erinn says:

        But at the same time – if Meghan hadn’t married Harry would that kitchen have been a cause she focused on?

      • Belluga says:

        Erinn – Probably not, since she probably wouldn’t be in the UK, but a community kitchen sounds right in line with Meghan’s previous soup kitchen volunteering.

      • Who ARE these people? says:

        And now she has the resources and visibility to take it a step further. It must be very satisfying.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Meghan first started volunteering in a soup kitchen when she was in middle or high school, no? Entirely possible she’d be involved with something like this regardless.

      • Claire says:

        I’m not dismissing the genuineness of her intentions,but let’s not pretend that this “championing women’s issues” before meeting Harry wasn’t used to boost her public image too. I’m not singling her out because people in the public eye -celebrities ,actors,royal families’ members- do it all the time and they are all very aware of the imagine they want to convey. It’s evident in a piece that she wrote for Elle that was honestly eye-roll worthy in some points. And when her agent said she wanted to be recognized as a humanitarian,the use of ‘recognized’ was deliberate.
        The bottom line is that these “charitable commitments” they do,whether it’s showing up for photo-ops and shaking hands for 10 minutes or showing more involvement in a project,are among the very few things that barely justify their life of privileges,living off taxpayers’ money. Let’s not pretend that it’s just about being passionate.

    • Mego says:

      This is it exactly and is why she flounders. Philanthrapy is not her passion and she is not a self starter so I doubt she will ever achieve much. Maybe the best thing for her to do is support William in his work.

      • duchess of hazard says:

        @Erinn, not necessarily a kitchen, but Meghan would have been focusing on an activity that is woman /feminine centric, be it periods or freshwater or education. In a way, this is her wheelhouse, because she’s backing a female centric activity (cooking) and using her heft to shine a light on it.

      • MaryContrary says:

        I agree-which is why she should just go the traditional way that the BRF has done for generations: go and smile and cut ribbons and collect flowers. It’s the bread and butter work-and there’s nothing wrong with it. People would be happy to see her out and about everyday attending all the different types of events that the Queen and the rest of the family has done. She doesn’t need a special initiative or project.

    • Redgrl says:

      @skylark – good point – I never thought of it that way (re the manufactured “passions” & hence sounding less than genuine.)

    • Aurelia says:

      Only thing kate has ever been passionate about is chasing money.

  9. Kay says:

    Well, it’s not like she’s going to work on (or even mention) the real root of most of family issues nationwide, which is class and huge economic inequality.

    It’s still going to be all about putting the blame on parents that are struggling, “teaching” them how to be better parents and care for their children. No one’s going to blame the structures of society that allow some families (like her own) to be filthy rich and spend endless amounts of time together in luxurious surroundings with paid nannies on hand, when others can hardly afford a one bedroom apartment in a dingy part of London.

    The rich using the poor as a photo op and public image booster, what else is new.

    • Who ARE these people? says:

      Right, it seems so willfully blind. Poor people toilet train their kids and teach them values. It’s the upper classes that seem to drop the ball on compassion and fairness.

    • Anitas says:

      Exactly. The Tories must be jumping with joy. This is the closest thing to the endorsement of the atrocious social policies that a royal can do.

    • Claire says:

      “The rich using the poor as a photo op and public image booster, what else is new”

      Isn’t this true for ALL of them? Harry,William,Meghan – see her trip to India and photo ops with children- the other royals,and every type of celebrities? Whether the purpose is somewhat genuine or not.

    • Jan90067 says:

      But you know, it’s not just “poor parents” that are struggling. It’s middle class, too. And across the board, there are parents that just don’t pay that much attention to their kids between taking selfies and posting shit on their phones. As a teacher, I found so many kids were coming into school almost non-verbal because parents (in my upper middle class neighborhood!) were more interested in looking at their phones than looking at their kids! You wouldn’t believe how many didn’t sing to or read to their kids. It’s truly astounding. So yes, it is down to parenting, no matter the class, that can cause problems in kids.

  10. sr says:

    After hearing what people who actually work in the charity sector in Britain think of Kate and her work, the comments here sound even more ridiculous.

    • OriginalLala says:

      oh..do tell!!

    • Agenbiter says:

      Please do – we need to know!

    • notasugarhere says:

      Oh, like the comments from someone who works at one of the charities who posted about how they had to beg Kate 8 times to visit? How she kept refusing and cancelling, then only showed up once for 20 minutes? That was boots on the ground fact from someone who worked at EACH iirc.

  11. Cee says:

    I hope this time’s the charm for her work ethic.

  12. Jen says:

    I think it’s good she’s choosing a focus, but I think a lot of it (she’s pouring over pages, trying to get a full picture, etc) is just going to be used as a way to excuse low work. “She’s so busy behind the scenes.”

    I also worry that she’s so superficial she will continue to take a superficial view on issues the way she did with her speech for Heads Together.

    • Natalie S says:

      I mean does anyone believe Kate was sitting with “mountains of paperwork?” I would not be surprised if the “mountain” turned out to be something like a folder of summaries of where the committee currently is in their work.

    • Derriere says:

      Saying she’s going to help poor children in Britain is not a focus, unfortunately. But now, she’ll be absolutely “swamped” in research, trying to figure out how best to be the mother to all of Britain’s children. /sarcasm

  13. Mego says:

    Kaiser is correct not dumb in saying that. it’s important because it’s a complex issue. Simplification leads to stereotyping , blaming the victim and doesn’t lead to the social change necessary to solve the problem. Modern “charity” work does require intelligence and engagement because the issues are complex and don’t often benefit from having a lot of money thrown at them. So I fear that The Duchess of Cambridge is biting off a lot more than she can chew and will accomplish little.

    • Skylark says:

      I think biting off more than she can chew is putting it very mildly. This is an incredibly complex issue and Kate imo is not someone, even with the best of intentions, who can offer anything useful or meaningful here.

      This really makes me cross because, apart from anything else, there are countless, highly-regarded organisations across the UK already working hand in hand with parents to assist them in getting their children off to the best start. Support those orgs, for God’s sake, instead of creating new ego-led forums which more often than not do little more than take up time, energy and money – all of which could and should be directed at the coalface where it’s needed and where it will actually do some practical good.

      • Nic919 says:

        Going in at the ground level and asking these organizations what they need in terms of help is much better and more effective than commanding from above and dictating how they will receive help. Creating a charity bureaucracy isn’t much different from the government doing it and at the end of the day the people who really need the help don’t end up getting much of anything.

  14. Jessica says:

    Seeing what Meghan can do (organize a cookbook) in less than a year that will absolutely provide beneficial, measured assistant to a worthy cause makes Kate seem… for lack of a better word, Pathetic. Kate won’t get her hands dirty with her new ‘effort’; rather, she’ll barely be bothered to show up for events. She’s such a disappointment and this will continue to be made more and more evident as Meghan steps up and Kate does not.

    • Deedee says:

      The nice thing about the cookbook is you put in the work once and you can continue to get funds from it over time. Meghan is smart.

      • Who ARE These People? says:

        And if this one’s a success, it can lead to follow-up cookbooks, cooking shows, cooking gear, all manner of fund-raising opportunities now.

      • Aurelia says:

        Gawd, bet hers is better than pippa’s pathetic attempt.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Indeed – there is a tangible benefit for those who need it with this. And I think this is why this story about Katie Keen was leaking at the same time as Meghan’s wonderful idea, she knows it make her look bad as she has done nothing that stands up against it.

      I wonder if Kate does a Fergie and puts her name to some childrens books.

  15. Tiffany says:

    ‘This is a lifelong project,’ said one royal source. ‘She is looking at what she can do over the next five, ten, 15, 20 years. She wants to be able to look back and see what difference has been made. That’s what her position in public life allows her to do.’

    I think you mean months Jason, oh I’m sorry, ‘source’.

    • Who ARE These People? says:

      And one wonders how, exactly, she would measure her accomplishments. What are the metrics for one’s success after “vaguely repeating vague phrases?”

      • Tiffany says:

        HA !!!!! You funny.

      • ShazBot says:

        You know they envision her standing beside young adults in 20+ years, taking credit for their accomplishments, maybe having a slide show of pics with Kate over the years. Classic example of people who are only thinking of what the results could look like, not how they’re actually going to realize them.

      • Natalie S says:

        I started thinking if Kate committed to a few causes and then worked on fundraising … she would be doing what she was expected to do this entire time. A large part of royal charity work is being a patron of charities and fundraising. I’m not entirely sure what the point was in this leak. I wish they could have clarified what is supposed to happen after the committee publishes their findings next year.

      • Belluga says:

        You’ve hit upon W&K’s entire modus operandi.

        1) Make huge, vague, intangible claim for future project.

        2) Do one photo op.

        3) Reap praise.

        4) Never mention it again.

        5) Pick new promise and go back to 1) when public opinion’s looking a bit wobbly.

        It’s not the results that matter, it’s the adulation, so get that bagged early and you never actually have to bother making an effort.

  16. Claire says:

    This is an incredibly important project. There are so many needy children coming from disadvantaged backgrounds. I think she’s chosen her passion wisely. Some on here just don’t give her any kind of break or recognition. Maybe she can help them with their mental health?

    • Natalie S says:

      What an ironic way to show support for destigmatizing mental health issues.

      • Claire says:

        I employ a number of people from abusive and neglected childhoods. They grow up to be emotionally stunted and angry individuals with drug and alcohol problems. If this is the path Kate has chosen I applaud her. Its so very important. Some on here are so consumed with despising her they are unable to appreciate when she’s doing something very meaningful. You being one based on your previous comments.

      • Natalie S says:

        It is so very important which is why I hope you don’t insinuate people are mentally ill in your actual life even if you do so here. Rather undercuts what you purport to support.

    • Skylark says:

      No, just being realistic. I’d happily give her a break if she demonstrated an active and genuine commitment to even one of the causes she’s a patron of.

      • Claire says:

        So here she is and you’re knocking her down.

      • Skylark says:

        No she’s not! This is talking not doing! How can you not see that?

      • Derriere says:

        @Claire I think you are confused. She is not working under any of her other patronages. She is creating a whole new initiative with vague statements and vague promises.

        For someone who has been vague on work ethic and tangible accomplishments outside of a ring, a title, and heirs, I think it’s fair to criticize her for again, not delivering when the stakes are high considering the issue she has decided to tackle.

      • Moonlight Shadow says:

        Her mental health charity did never take off for lack of support by Kate. Same for her other charities. Which is why Kate is now wheeling out another charity.

        Charities are even trying to get rid of her because she is the laziest patron around and she keeps patrons’ chairs occupied despite better people applying.

    • Anitas says:

      Claire, anything that benefits children, especially disadvantaged children is hugely important. The problem here is that it’s a complex issue because families are disadvantaged for so many reasons, as you undoubtedly know yourself, and some of the most important reasons are the huge income disparity and terrible social policies. None of which can Kate even mention because of her position. So whether she likes it or not, all she can do is skim around these problems and pretend children grow up with issues because parents are neglectful for some mysterious reason, and social diseases like substance abuse and gang violence thrive out of thin air I guess; adding more pressure to these families. I’m sure the poors will be thrilled with a rich privileged lady living off their money alluding it’s all their fault.

    • Belluga says:

      The problem is precedent. We’ve heard so many times from the KP press office that Kate is choosing a new passion, that’s she’s going to start a big new project in the near future, that this time she’s really going to knuckle down and start working… All promises for future efforts that don’t materialise. This has been going in for years, and it’s not just her, William does it too.

      Recognition comes with effort and results. I could say today I’m going to run a marathon next year, but should I expect praise and recognition before I actually train and run the thing?

  17. LANYCgo says:

    Kates been involved with William in some aspect for about 15years already. I think she is who she is and not much with change in her personality. She’s not a worker bee, she’s not a doer, but she will always be pushed, promoted and propped up by the UK Media and Palace PR.

    The only reason Kate has not been ripped to shreds in a big way for her laziness by the Uk media is because of who she married.

  18. SWP says:

    I’m torn. I want to believe this is her turning point (she may be lazy, but I don’t see her as a vicious person) and I want to believe she’s done having kids, she’s getting older/maturing, her speeches have improved, maybe she will really start…doing stuff. Shining, for lack of a better term. So many people on here have such vitriol for her I want to give her a break.

    But….she’s been keen so many times and so many empty promises in the past….ay yi yi.

    • Jess says:

      Unfortunately, actions speak louder than words. She’s been disappointing people on here whose kept up with news about her pre-wedding. It explains the vitriol people have for her on this site. Her inconsistency makes it really hard for people to trust her when she says she’ll put more work and effort.

      I’m just hoping this would be a better campaign than heads together.

  19. W1hatever says:

    This is such a worthwhile and important cause and I’m glad she’s getting involved but unlike Meghan’s cookbook project, we will not start to see the results of this project for another 20 years or so. Whereas with Meghan’s cookbook we will see results pretty quickly in book sales and money raised for the Hubb.

    In a way, I admire her for taking on such complex issues because she could have very well chosen an easier area to focus on but she really does need a smaller project where results can be seen quickly. Perhaps she could run a marathon, swim the English Channel, climb a mountain somewhere or set up and participate in a charity tennis match to raise money for one or more of her patronages? (see the success of Soccer Aid). She enjoys sporty stuff so she should do something she enjoys to benefit her patronages.

  20. someone says:

    Britain’s got problems with teenage and pre-teen girls being sold into the sex trade, teenagers with chronic drinking problems, girls being raped and being ignored by the police and councillors-if that is not broken britain, what is ??

    • violet says:

      @someone – If I’m taking your hint rightly, you’re referring to the Rotherham stuff, which I only became aware of this year when another such story broke out? From where I’m sitting that would be way too risky to delve into, it has political ramifications, too, because those were local elected councillors weren’t they?

      What I’m surprised at and maybe some British posters can chime in here, is that they even had the gumption to use the phrase “Broken Britain”. It’s very negative and regardless of whether or not it’s justified, I can imagine your Prime Minister wincing as she hears it.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Considering this ‘leak’ came from the Daily Fail am not surprised they used the term ‘Broken Britain’ and yes its a very political term used by politicians and right wing rags like the Fail to whip up the right winger tabloid readers. If this came from KP that term would not have been used, so me thinks it was the Fail leaking the story at the behest of the Cambridges but adding some of their infamous passive aggressive snark at her.

      • Moonlight Shadow says:

        “Broken Britain” was a phrase which the former Prime Minister David Cameron used to convince people that everything in Britain was broken and guess what, he was gonna fix it.
        He made it a lot worse.
        It is absolutely degrading to refer to families as “broken” because mostly these families are struggling due to circumstances which aren’t under their control like a minimum wage which isn’t a living wage. Or zero-hour-contracts. Or bad schools.

        Imagine a single-parent on the minimum wage who tries everything to keep his/her children on the right track while working full time and running a household. At the same time this parent keeps worrying about the neighbourhood where there are too many shady things going on (drugs, petty crime, prostitution).
        And then this Buckingham Palace tart comes along and calls his/her family a “broken family” while simultaneously this tart isn’t even able to run her own household despite plenty of staff and while she needs two or three child minders despite hardly ever working. Her “neighbourhood” isn’t a problem because she has more policemen protecting her than most poor neighbourhoods see in a month.
        (Yep, royal protection officers are policemen who are sent to work for the Royals.)

  21. Laur says:

    I can take or leave the Royals overall, but I think this is a bit tone deaf from them. Getting a woman who has barely worked for 10 years (pre-children) to talk about ‘Broken Britain’ and all that goes with it is such a slap in the face to all the people this initiative is supposed to help. I work with the kids who would fall into this bracket, and they need decent investment in their lives, not someone who literally can’t relate to them turning up once in a blue moon. This is such a worthy cause but I just have no confidence that she will do it justice.

    • Lexa says:

      My understanding is that she’s bringing together experts from various fields who will then make direct recommendations end of this year/early next on what actions the Royal Foundation can take to directly help and impact the lives of the underserved children. I think that’s the best way to do it because, like you said, it’s not as if she has personal experience with this and she has no formal education in this subject. My hope is that we see her doing work that leads to measurable and concrete results vs just hosting conversations.

      • Corporatestepsister says:

        Lexa; this is a woman who can’t even run her own household, or do a full schedule of appearances despite having a perfectly arranged office and support staff. Kate is not someone who reached out to anyone who wasn’t titled or loaded and I do not think she’ll be taken seriously at all. I also do not believe that she understands ANYTHING about how life goes without people to smooth the way for oneself. She’s always had her family and the press making things easy for her.

      • Moonlight Shadow says:

        The recommendations for helping “broken” families are out there and have been out there for a long time.
        It is mostly a matter of how much money politicians are willing to spend on the bottom 20% of the people. And as long as politicians/voters aren’t willing to do that nothing will change.

  22. Moonlight Shadow says:

    What can you do about a child who comes from a “broken” family (aka single parent, little money, little education, working long shifts or zero-hour contracts or being bullied by the job agency).
    For your information: zero-hour-contracts are “employment” contracts which don’t guarantee any kind of income nor any kind of minimum working hours to the employee. But instead the employee has to wait for a phone call and then rush to work. There is no guarantee that he gets that phone call. He only gets as many working hours as his boss deems necessary for his business. The tragedy is that the employee sits at home waiting for a phone call but at the same time he can’t go out and do other work. He literally is a the beck and call of his boss.
    As a result the employee never knows how much money he will earn. But he has to go to the job agency and get some social benefits money to make ends meet.
    It is exploitation but legal. Even stand-by duty contracts are usually guaranteed a certain wage.

    You can take the child out of that family. I do not approve of that because orphanages aren’t better than poor parents. Statistically a child who doesn’t grow up in his family has a high risk of being abused.

    You can improve education institutions and social work and the employment contracts of the parents. But those can be achieved by political policies and the royal family is supposed to not interfere in politics. and quite frankly I doubt that Kate would even point out these bad policies.

    • violet says:

      Sorry to reply so late, but I was just aghast reading this, and then I looked up the term, and it turns out these kinds of jobs are used all over the world, they are just called other things.

      The saddest thing about the West in the globalization years and since Reagan (I’m not trying to offend personally anyone who voted that way) is what happened to the labor movement. Both my parents supported their unions. We like to think over here we don’t do this kind of thing, but we do.

      Did anyone else see “Left Behind America” on PBS last week, focusing on Dayton, OH? What an eye-opener. I don’t think we here can point fingers at the UK.

      • jwoolman says:

        My brother worked at a grocery store here in the US that arbitrarily, with no discussion, shifted his number of hours down to the point where he wasn’t making enough to pay his rent. He was close enough to Social Security age that he was able to keep from being evicted by going on Social Security a few years early, taking a cut in monthly benefits permanently as a result. It was also a mess because despite his low income and hence low level of Social Security benefits, he ended up unexpectedly having to pay a few hundred more dollars in federal taxes because our lovely Congress decided it was okay to tax Social Security benefits even at his pitiful level. Oh, and the same employer switched health insurance so he had to pay twice as much every month for his prescriptions.

        Since his work schedule was so variable and he was getting old, he really couldn’t try to find another job.

        Yeah, this trick is pulled in many different ways around the world.