News Business News Farm bill in works, still difficult By Dan Looker Dan Looker Resides In: Des Moines, Iowa Dan's agricultural journalism career began at the Center for Rural Affairs in Nebraska as its publications editor. He was farm editor at the Lincoln Journal-Star during the farm debt crisis of the 1980s and later worked at The Des Moines Register as agribusiness writer. In 1992 he joined the staff of Successful Farming magazine as business editor. Successful Farming's Editorial Guidelines Published on April 9, 2013 Trending Videos Close this video player Leaders of congressional ag committees from both partiesseem optimistic that there will be a farm bill this year, but tough negotiatingremains, especially if committees have to trim spending even more than they didwhen putting together bills in 2012. That's the view the shared Tuesday with members of NorthAmerican Agricultural Journalists at the Capitol during the ag writer's annualmeeting. "Will we get a five-year farm bill this year? I believewe will," said Representative Mike Conaway (R-TX), who was standing in forHouse Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas (R-OK). Conaway heads thesubcommittee on general farm commodities and risk management. Conaway said that he believes there will be less money forthe bill. He doesn't believe the committee will make big changes to how cropinsurance is supported by the federal government. "It will still be strong," Conaway toldAgriculture.com in response to a question. Crop insurers are telling Congress "give us credit forthe haircuts we've had in the past," Conaway said. The House ag committee's ranking Democrat, Collin Peterson of Minnesota, seems to be a strong supporter as well. But he is hearing complaints from some of his farmer constituents about insurance not being limited for very large farms.VIDEO: More with Collin Peterson Conaway said he expects his committee to mark up a new farm bill sometimelate this month or in May, but it won't be easy and it will need support ofboth parties in the committee to have a chance of passing on the floor of theHouse. "There won't be 218 people in either party that willvote for it," he said, referring to the number needed to reach a majority."I think this will, by necessity, be a bipartisan bill." Strong support for protecting crop insurance from bigchanges was voiced by Senate Agriculture Chairwoman, Debbie Stabenow (D-MI). "We are talking about insurance...so the farmer hasskin in the game. It's not a subsidy," said Stabenow. "We need tomake sure it's affordable for farmers." Just as a year ago, negotiating changes to the commoditytitle of the farm bill and the spending level for the nutrition title remaindifficult. Peterson said that more moneycould be saved from SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, if thefederal government and not states, determined the income level for eligibilityfor what used to be called food stamps. The federal threshold for food stamp eligibility is 130% ofthe poverty level, Peterson said, but in red states, it's actually higher--200%in North Dakota, 165% in Texas and 185% in Arizona, versus 130% in Peterson'sstate of Minnesota. "The states that you would think would use this (thelower, federal level) are not," he said. Peterson said he's urging his committee colleagues "weshould be looking at policy here, instead of a number." Stabenow's committee cut less from nutrition last year thanthe House ag committee. This year, there isn't support in the Senate "tochange eligibility standards or the structure" of the program, she said. In negotiations over the commodity title, Stabenow said shehopes to find "middle ground" with southern interests, who arerepresented on the committee by the ranking Republican, Thad Cochran ofMississippi. But she also wants to "maintain the reforms in thebill," including the elimination of direct payments. Those payments stayedin effect for another year when the 2008 farm law was extended in earlyJanuary. Cochran, for his part, said told NAAJ members that he's nottrying to hold up the farm bill in order to get a target price program for riceand peanut farmers. "I think they work. It's not an exact science," hesaid. "I'm open to considering what level we set thoserates," Cochran added. Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! Tell us why! Other Submit