340
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      CVIA now indexed by SCOPUS from February 2024. CVIA received its first Journal Impact Factor (0.5) in the 2023 Journal Citation Reports Release. 

      Interested in becoming a CVIA published author?

      • Platinum Open Access with no APCs. 
      • Fast peer review/Fast publication online after article acceptance.

      Submissions should be made electronically at: https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/cvia-journal.

      Please refer to the Author Guidelines at https://cvia-journal.org/instructions-to-authors/ before submission.

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In-Stent Thrombosis after Antiplatelet Therapy Conversion while Awaiting Coronary Bypass

      case-report
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            In-stent thrombosis (IST) is a rare yet dangerous complication that may occur despite optimized coronary intervention in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. This is a case of an 81-year-old man who presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Right coronary artery (RCA) occlusion was suspected. RCA angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention were performed. Complicated left coronary artery disease was subsequently discovered. Per cardiothoracic surgeon request, the patient was transitioned from ticagrelor to clopidogrel therapy in preparation for coronary artery bypass grafting. The patient experienced IST the day before surgery while receiving clopidogrel. We examine this case, which highlights the complexity of antiplatelet therapy choice and the role of genetic testing in evaluation of IST risk.

            Main article text

            Abbreviations: CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; IST, in-stent thrombosis; IVUS, intravenous ultrasound; OR, odds ratio; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RCA, right coronary artery; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

            Introduction

            In-stent thrombosis (IST) is a rare yet potentially catastrophic complication following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that may occur despite optimal stent placement. In addition to the technical aspects of PCI in preventing future complications, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a key component in maintaining stent patency following the procedure. The challenges in using DAPT include suboptimal platelet reactivity, bleeding risk, and the high cost of certain antiplatelet therapies. Our case highlights the complexity of P2Y12 receptor antagonist therapy and the subsequent consequences of poor metabolization.

            Case Report

            An 81-year-old man with a medical history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia presented to the emergency department with weakness and discomfort in his left arm that developed after exertion. Electrocardiogram revealed inferior ST elevation (Figure 1). The patient was given 180 mg of ticagrelor and transferred to our primary PCI facility. On arrival, the patient was hypotensive with intermittent atrioventricular block. Right coronary artery (RCA) occlusion was suspected. Because of the patient’s tenuous hemodynamic status, RCA angiography was performed before left coronary angiography and revealed the culprit mid RCA occlusion (Figure 2). A workhorse wire was advanced into the RCA and used to cross the suspected lesion. A 2.0 mm×12 mm compliant balloon was then used to predilate the mid RCA occlusion. An intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) catheter was then advanced to determine the size of the vessel. Evidence of thrombus in the posterior left ventricular branch was present. An aspiration thrombectomy catheter was advanced, and aspiration of the thrombus was performed, with minimal thrombus retrieved. A 3.25 mm×28 mm drug-eluting stent was deployed and advanced. A 3.25 mm×15 mm noncompliant balloon was used to postdilate the middle portion of the stent. IVUS catheter inspection revealed a well-apposed and expanded stent (Figure 3) without evidence of vessel complication and no edge dissection. Postdeployment angiography confirmed successful stenting of the mid RCA, with restored Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow (Figure 4).

            Figure 1

            Admission 12-Lead Electrocardiogram.

            Figure 2

            Posterior Left Ventricular Angiography before Stenting.

            Figure 3

            Intravascular Ultrasound Catheter Confirmation Following Stent Placement.

            Figure 4

            Right Coronary Angiography after Stenting.

            Subsequent left coronary angiography revealed high-grade complex distal left main coronary artery disease. As the patient remained stable, no PCI was performed at that time and the patient was transferred to the cardiac critical care unit. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed an ejection fraction of 45–49% with inferior wall akinesis. The patient was referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), which he initially refused and elected for an outpatient high-risk PCI. The patient was discharged in a stable condition 2 days later while receiving ticagrelor and low-dose aspirin. Four days following discharge, the patient presented to the emergency department with recurrent angina. A cardiothoracic surgeon was consulted, and the patient agreed to proceed with inpatient CABG. Because of concern for perioperative bleeding risk, the patient was switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel therapy per cardiothoracic surgeon request. Before ticagrelor was stopped, the patient was given clopidogrel with an initial dose of 300 mg and then 75 mg daily. The patient remained in the hospital, and CABG was scheduled to be performed 4 days after admission. The day before surgery, 4 days after conversion from ticagrelor to clopidogrel therapy, he developed an inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (Figure 5). A cardiothoracic surgeon was contacted, and the patient was transferred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for emergent angiography, which revealed IST. Balloon angioplasty and aspiration of the RCA thrombus was performed (Figure 6). Optical coherence tomography revealed the presence of thrombus inside the stent without evidence of edge dissection or other cause of stent thrombosis. TIMI 3 flow was restored, and the patient returned to the cardiac intensive care unit in stable condition to await CABG, which was successfully performed the following day. CYP2C19 genotype assessment was ordered to assess the cause of the IST. Genotyping revealed the presence of two copies of the CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function allele in the CYP2C19 gene, indicating that the patient was a poor clopidogrel metabolizer. Thus, subtherapeutic levels of the active clopidogrel metabolite led to an increased risk of stent thrombosis.

            Figure 5

            Inferior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, 4 Days after Conversion from Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel Therapy.

            Figure 6

            Before (left) and after (right) Balloon Angioplasty and Aspiration of the Right Coronary Artery Thrombus.

            Discussion

            This case highlights potential challenges when one is evaluating patients who present with IST. It is important to consider intracoronary imaging during PCI in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, particularly STEMI. The most predictive risk factors for early IST (within 30 days) include the premature discontinuation of use of P2Y12 inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 36.5), undersized stents (OR=13.46), coronary artery dissection (OR=6.19), low TIMI flow after PCI (OR=5.24), and coronary artery disease greater than 50% proximal to the lesion (OR=4.15) [1]. The use of intracoronary imaging facilitates optimization of PCI and reduces the risks of stent underexpansion and malapposition. As we performed intracoronary imaging during the initial PCI and again during the recurrent STEMI with IST, we determined that mechanical factors related to stent deployment were not responsible for IST. With respect to this and the timing of the recurrent IST, altered genetic response to clopidogrel metabolization was suspected to play a role in IST. The studied recovery of platelet function following withdrawal of ticagrelor between 48 hours and 5 days is consistent with the recurrent STEMI 4 days after conversion from ticagrelor to clopidogrel therapy in this case (with confirmed intake of clopidogrel due to inpatient administration) [2]. Several CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms are known to contribute to poor active metabolite generation and subsequent thrombotic events in patients taking clopidogrel. The most common mutations leading to poor clopidogrel metabolism are CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 loss-of-function alleles [3, 4]. Standard-of-care DAPT currently includes the administration of ticagrelor or prasugrel, active metabolite inhibitors of the P2Y12 receptor, to bypass the risk of thrombotic events that may be in part due to these polymorphisms. With the advances in genetic testing technology, rapid genetic testing for mutations that lead to clopidogrel resistance are now widely available. Although routine testing for CYP2C19 mutations is not indicated at this time, in select cases genetic testing may be considered, especially in patients with a history of stent thrombosis after PCI, such as our patient [5, 6]. Genotyping patients after PCI for acute coronary syndrome may also provide useful prognostic data for predicting cardiovascular risk of both ischemic and bleeding events [6]. While preventive genetic testing is not routinely recommended for patients undergoing PCI, ongoing clinical trial data are needed to determine the ideal patients who are most likely to benefit from genotype testing.

            Conclusion

            IST is an uncommon but potential fatal complication of PCI. General considerations for the cause of IST include suboptimal stent deployment and suboptimal response to antiplatelet therapy. Our case highlights the importance of intracoronary imaging to exclude mechanical stent-related features that could lead to IST. Confidence in stent optimization leads to the further differential of suboptimal response to antiplatelet therapy; in our case, this testing led to the proven diagnosis of poor clopidogrel metabolizer status and prompt change to more efficacious antiplatelet therapies.

            Funding Information

            None

            Disclosures

            None

            References

            1. van WerkumJW, HeestermansAA, ZomerAC, KelderJC, SuttorpMJ, RensingBJ, et al. Predictors of coronary stent thrombosis: the Dutch Stent Thrombosis Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1399–409.

            2. StoreyRF, BlidenKP, EcobR, KarunakaranA, ButlerK, WeiC, et al. Earlier recovery of platelet function after discontinuation of treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with high antiplatelet responses. J Thromb Haemost 2011;9:1730–7.

            3. MegaJL, SimonT, ColletJP, AndersonJL, AntmanEM, BlidenK, et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2010;304:1821–30.

            4. HarmszeAM, van WerkumJW, Ten BergJM, ZwartB, BoumanHJ, BreetNJ, et al. CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C9*3 alleles are associated with stent thrombosis: a case-control study. Eur Heart J 2010;31:3046–53.

            5. ClaassensDMF, VosGJA, BergmeijerTO, HermanidesRS, van‘t HofAWJ, van der HarstP, et al. A genotype-guided strategy for oral P2Y12 inhibitors in primary PCI. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1621–31.

            6. SibbingD, AradiD, AlexopoulosD, Ten BergJ, BhattDL, BonelloL, et al. Updated expert consensus statement on platelet function and genetic testing for guiding P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:1521–37.

            Author and article information

            Journal
            CVIA
            Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications
            CVIA
            Compuscript (Ireland )
            2009-8782
            2009-8618
            November 2020
            November 2020
            : 5
            : 2
            : 139-143
            Affiliations
            [1] 1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
            Author notes
            Correspondence: Ki Park, Clinical Assistant Professor in Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA, Tel.: +352-265-0239, E-mail: ki.park@ 123456medicine.ufl.edu
            Article
            cvia.2019.0589
            10.15212/CVIA.2019.0589
            557bd997-9441-4c14-b621-55295b5b738d
            Copyright © 2020 Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

            History
            : 12 May 2020
            : 17 August 2020
            : 28 August 2020
            Categories
            Case Report

            General medicine,Medicine,Geriatric medicine,Transplantation,Cardiovascular Medicine,Anesthesiology & Pain management
            drugs/pharmacotherapy,antiplatelet therapy,drug-eluting stent,Acute myocardial infarction/ST-elevation myocardial infarction,platelet biology,genetics

            Comments

            Comment on this article