↓ Skip to main content

Wolters Kluwer

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Patellar Tendon, Hamstring Tendon, and Double-Bundle ACL Reconstructions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
27 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Patellar Tendon, Hamstring Tendon, and Double-Bundle ACL Reconstructions
Published in
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Mohtadi, Denise Chan, Rhamona Barber, Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Poland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 46 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Sports and Recreations 12 7%
Psychology 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 56 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,269,845
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
#205
of 1,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,374
of 277,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.