- NEWS
AI-generated images threaten science — here’s how researchers hope to spot them
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Nature 635, 268-269 (2024)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03542-8
Quiz answers: Images a, d and e are from real scientific papers. Images b, c and f were generated by Proofig’s artificial-intelligence software.
References
Saguy, A. et al. Small Meth. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202400672 (2024).
AI image generators often give racist and sexist results: can they be fixed?
AI-generated images and video are here: how could they shape research?
Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers
What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science
Why Nature will not allow the use of generative AI in images and video
ChatGPT broke the Turing test — the race is on for new ways to assess AI
AI models fed AI-generated data quickly spew nonsense
‘Papermill alarm’ software flags potentially fake papers
AI beats human sleuth at finding problematic images in research papers