Jesus is not returning…for God has sent a new messenger into the world who comes
from the same Angelic Assembly to continue the work of Jesus. To reclaim Knowledge
given to each person. No one is coming to save us, God sent us here to save the world.

Lots of people have different views on what the Star of Bethlehem was.
I conclude that we should pay attention to the Hebrew word “Bethulah” = virgin and “lehem” = bread
and note that the sheaf of wheat in Virgo’s hand where the star Spica is – is central to understanding
how the Persian magi calculated the birth of Jesus from ASTRONOMICAL KNOWLEDGE about 400 years ahead of time, as I describe in more detail in the book:   End Times and 2019
Similar knowledge and understanding allows us to calculate the timeline of the final seven years. Also consider reading   Antichrist 2016-2019: Mystery Babylon, Barack Obama & the Islamic Caliphate

RELIGION IS FOR PRIMITIVE UNEDUCATED SPINELESS BACKSTABBERS!!

Whatever happens its al in the stars they say.

I looked this up on Solar System Scope …..dialed back to Aug 17 -2 the Venus/Jupiter set up was obvious as the Earth was across the way and Venus would have been full and straight in line with Jupiter and it looks as if this could have definitely been very special to see. However, when you set the dials for June 30, 2015 you do not get the straight line nor do you have the best position for the Venus reflection … more like 50 % … therefore this story seems to me to be over-hyped.

Sorry, but it will not be the same star that announced the birth of the Lord Jesus Christ.
(Extract from Illuminati Exposed – by Ray Novosel)

JESUS CHRIST – THE SIX POINTED STAR
The key to this ultimate deception in the never-ending propaganda war for the souls of men through the taking of the Mark, is in the Christianising of Judeo-Masonic/occult symbolism. An example of this perversion is in the depiction of the “Jewish Star” (the interlaced triangles) as a representation of Jesus Christ – the ultimate blasphemy!

Some random examples of typical fuzzy, church-establishment logic, generally believed by their blinded Judaised sheeple within, can be seen from the following random quotes taken recently from the web. The first is a classic from Rick Chamberlin, where he asks a pre-answered question; “Is the Star of David Kosher?” “Yeshua said, “I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright and morning star.” Perhaps, just perhaps, the Star of David represents not only Israel and the Jewish people, but even the Messiah Yeshua. After Yeshua’s birth in Bethlehem, some wise men [magi] arrived from the east in Jerusalem saying, Where is He who has been born king of the Jews? For we saw His star in the east, and have come to worship Him.” These wise men were aware of the prophecy of Balaam in Numbers 24. Could it be that they saw the Star of David?”

Another classic case of the inability to correctly distinguish between the terms “Israel” and “The Jews.”
From “The Archetypal Mandala of the Star of David” by Margaret Starbird, comes something a little closer to the truth: “The mandala of the hexagram, also known as the “Star of David” is an archetypal symbol for the sacred union of the opposite energies, it is the “yin-yang” of Western civilization. Formed by the intertwining of the “fire” and “water” triangles (the male “blade” and the female “chalice”) this symbol represents the masculine and feminine principles in perfect union, the “sacred marriage” or “hieros gamous” of the ancient world.

The Jewish Cabbala suggests that the Ark of the Covenant contains, in addition to the tables of the Ten Commandments, “a regular hexagram representing a man and woman in intimate embrace. Since “Sacred Union” is the source of all life on this planet, the six-pointed star uniting the archetypal male and female triangles has long been acknowledged as the model for balance and wholeness. Medieval Alchemists called the Star the “Philosopher’s stone,” adding a tiny dot on the upper right hand point to represent the presence of God and guidance of the Divine Spirit. It is the “missing link” of the sacred marriage between Christianity and Juadism. It’s rising now to bless and enlighten us, and is truly a gift for all peoples!”

Quote number three – with a slightly different emphasis: “The Star of David is made up of two equilateral triangles. One triangle is pointing down, and the other triangle is pointing up. The triangle that is pointing down is God’s triangle and represents the trinity of Soul, Body, and Spirit, or God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit reaching down to man. The triangle that is pointing up is man’s triangle and also represents the trinity of Soul, Body, and Spirit, but of man reaching up to God. – The Star of David is also the symbol that fully represents the spiritual intercourse referenced in John chapter 17 where Jesus Christ is in God, man is in Jesus Christ, and thereby man is in God through Jesus Christ. The symbol for the Messiah, the Greatest King, or King of Kings; who would come from the lineage of David, who would be fully God and also fully man throughout eternity can only be Jesus the Christ – the God/Man. The Star of David is and can only be the symbol for Jesus Christ.”

Quote number four – the standard “New Age” version: “The six-pointed star, the Star of David, has been the symbol of Judaism and the Jewish culture for ages. The meaning of this symbol can be interpreted in various ways. In light of the revelations contained within The Aquarian Gospel, I present the following interpretation of the symbolic meaning of the six-pointed star: God is Truth. He has three attributes: Strength, Wisdom and Love. An appropriate symbol for God is a triangle. What better way to symbolize God than with a simple, equilateral triangle, standing upright? Structural experts say the equilateral triangle is the strongest shape. Wisdom and Love stand on the foundation of Strength.

A triangle is simple and uncomplicated, as is God. He is pure strength, pure wisdom and pure love. Master teachers tell us that Man has God’s image within his soul, but that Man fell from his position, because he strayed, by disobeying His Father’s command not to bite into the apple (of physical pleasure). Masters also tell us that Man, in his fallen condition, is Truth reversed. What better way to symbolize Man than by a triangle identical to that of God, but inverse: upside down? If we overlay these two triangles, we have a six-pointed star, the Star of David. This overlay symbolizes that God, forever upright, never abandons His fallen Children, but remains linked to Mankind, in an ever-present pose of upright Truth. He stands silently upright, waiting for Man to right himself. What better way to symbolize the religion and the culture chosen by God to deliver to the world His message of Salvation than by the Star of David? And, what better way to symbolize the imminent reunification of Judaism and Christianity than with the Star of David, combined with the cross of Christ standing firmly uprigh, upon the foundation of strength, enclosed by wisdom and Love?”

When asked in Luke 21:25 for what sign would mark the “Great Tribulation,” Christ replies, “there shall be signs in the sun, the moon and the stars.” From “The Alpha and the Omega,” by Jim A. Cornwell – chapter 6, ” The Star Of Bethlehem and Coma Berenices ” “The birth, life and death of Jesus Christ had been prophesied centuries earlier. Around the year 4 B.C., according to the astrological records of the Qumran Priests, of an ancient village of Palestine on the north-western shore of the Dead Sea in the West Bank east of Jerusalem and noted for the caves in which the Dead Sea Scrolls were found.

They recorded that a comet produced a heavenly spectacle, and there was a fiery conjunction of several planets in the zodiacal sign of Pisces. Naturally this could have been simply assumed as the Star of Bethlehem. It is significant that the Babylonian Ideograph or a graphic symbol for ‘star’ was the same as for ‘God,’ although for ‘God’ it was repeated three times stressing the close link between the gods and the stars. In most cuneiform inscriptions and hieroglyphics it is well established that the sign for God was always a star.”

To the adepts, the Star of David is a potent symbol of the interaction of the Divine with the mortal, of god (Satan) with Humankind. Ancient Astrologers have always held that the Macrocosm (Six Pointed Star) reflects the Microcosm (Five Pointed Star). Where the smallest particle of reality mirrors the design of the largest particle of reality. Electrons for example, spinning around the nucleus of the atom bears a striking resemblance to the planets spinning around the Sun.

Yet another New Age website explains that the Star of Bethlehem was a planetary configuration which formed a Star of David upon a Cross. It postulates that this heavenly sign, which involves the esoteric knowledge of sacred geometry, was only observed by the magi who were astrologers or high adepts in the mystery schools of Babylon. Can you now see where it’s all heading? For more info ref: The Astroarchaeological Star of Bethlehem

We are continually admonished by our gracious God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ to “be wise as serpents, yet innocent as doves,” and it is for this reason that I tend to labour on certain important issues. We MUST understand basic occult principles so as to be able to adequately defend and reinforce our own “rightly divided” Christian Truth, and know WHY we reject the subtle and clever satanic counterfeit from the father of all lies.

K N O W Y O U R E N E M Y !

Black Sabbath-Sign Of The Southern Cross.mp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhZ2q4BcmWA

Jesus will punish the fascists.

“The Return Of The Bethlehem Star! Is This Another Sign Of The Returning Messiah?”

Seeing as Bethlehem the star never went missing, then no. It is a sign of your desperately clutching at straws though, trying to force fit pagan allegory of the annual solar cycle represented as Dionysus, into your future context death cultism fear porn. Dionysus has already had a 2nd coming/serving, called Jesus. Dionysus is a composite Greek word, Dion having the same meaning as Christ. It’s the difference between Greek and Latin language syntax, ie Christ Ysus, v’s Jesus Christ. QED.

Just another Church trap!

Bethlehem Small Clan Judah ~ Hmm! Hallelujah Best Candle

Bethlehem Small Clan ‘n’ Judah ~ Hmm! Nascent* Hallelujah Bled

Nascent:

1. Emergent
2. (Chemistry) Chiefly Reactive Hydrogen…….

Reactive Hydrogen ~ Thievery on Graced

Chiefly Reactive Hydrogen ~ Headily Fetching Recovery

Simon Magus created the pagan “catholic” church.

Hasting’s Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, Vol. 2, p. 496: “But it need NOT be supposed that when Simon broke with the Christians HE RENOUNCED ALL HE HAD LEARNED. It is more probable that he carried some of the Christian ideas with him, and that he wove these into a system of his own. This system is a mixture of pagan ideas wrapped with Christian names and identities.

We further find in Schaff’s History of the Church a reference to this Simon Magus. He says: “The author, or first representative of this baptized HEATHENISM, according to the uniform testimony of Christian antiquity, is Simon Magus, who unquestionably adulterated Christianity with pagan ideas and practices, and gave himself out, in a pantheistic style for an emanation of God” (Apostolic Christianity), Vol. 2, p. 566).

Harnack, a church historian, states that Simon Magus “proclaimed a doctrine in which the Jewish faith was strangely and grotesquely mixed with BABYLONIAN myths, together with some Greek additions. The mysterious worship . . . in consequence of the widened horizon and the deepening religious feeling, finally the wild SYNCRETISM [that is, blending together of religious beliefs], whose aim WAS A UNIVERSAL RELIGION, all contributed to gain adherents for Simon” (Vol. 1, p. 244).

The Bible shows he had been working through demons. And yet, he finally called himself a “Christian.” Dr. McGiffert, speaking of Simon Magus, says: “His effort to rival and surpass Jesus very likely began after his contact with the Christians that Luke records. His religious system was apparently a SYNCRETISM of Jewish and Oriental elements” (Hasting’s Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, Vol. 2, p. 497)

Eerdman’s Handbook to the History of Christianity notes, “Early Christian writers regarded Simon as the fount of all heresies” (p. 100). The Encyclopaedia Britannica (11th ed.) in its article on Simon Magus identifies him as the “founder of a school of Gnostics and as a father of heresy.” Noted historian Edward Gibbon says the Gnostics “blended with the faith of Christ many sublime but obscure tenets which they derived from oriental philosophy” (The Triumph of Christendom in the Roman Empire, p. 15).

One point that should be noted is there is a mixing of several religious ideas. This is one of the identifying characteristics of the beast of Rev. 13 that is identified as the Roman Catholic Church. Revelation 13:2 “Now the beast which I saw was like a leopard, his feet were like the feet of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion.”

The four beasts used to make up the beast are the same four beasts, Daniel saw in vision in Daniel 7. As a matter of fact, papal Rome inherited from each of these pagan empires some of their basic identifying traits that we still see practiced in this modern day false system of religion, the Roman Catholic Church. From Babylon, the lion the papacy inherited a pagan priesthood; from Medo-Persia, the bear sun worship; from Greece, the leopard human philosophies; and from the dragon, Pagan Rome, its power, seat and great authority. As stated in Rev. 13:2 the mixing of these pagan ideas of the Roman catholic church had its onset from the very beginning. From this Simon Magnus who was well versed in all of these abominable doctrines and false system of worship created the early Catholic Church. These abominably doctrines can be traced back to the very beginning throw Simon Magnus.

Even though there is only one event that was recorded by Luke, it would not be unreasonable to assume that Simon had heard the apostle on several occasions. He likely also spoke with many of the new converts of the new church. It could be said that Simon Magus had great interest in spiritual matters and most likely was very well versed in both Jewish teaching and that of the new Christian church. Simon had mixed Judaism, early Christianity and Babylonian, Greek. Paganism into one religion and appointed himself as the leader. Here we see the well documented mixing of religions from several historical sources and The Bible itself. What did he do with this new religion?

Did Simon stay in Jerusalem as the head of his own little cult? What were his plans for this new mixing of religions? History shows that Simon Magus did not stay in Jerusalem but moved to Rome. It is also well recognized that the religions of Asia, by Greek and Roman times, had also passed to the West. By the first century, the mystery religions of the Babylonians were centered primarily in Rome. At that time, Rome was the chief city of the world. With Rome as the center of the world it would only make sense that Simon Magus would move to Rome to spread his new religion a mixture of pagan beliefs and Christian doctrine.

Simon Magus’ move to Rome is noted in several historical writings. His goal as stated by historical records was to create a universal church, “Religion”. A little side note that many are aware of is the meaning of the word catholic. The word catholic means universal. The word Catholic (katholikos from katholou — throughout the whole, i.e., universal) occurs in the Greek classics. Yes, the correct meaning of the Catholic Church is the Universal Church.

Simon can be classified among the major group of so-called Christians (and Simon called himself such), called by Harnack the: “decidedly anti-Jewish groups .. . . They advanced much further in the criticism of the Old Testament and perceived the impossibility of saving it [that is, the Old Testament] for the Christian UNIVERSAL RELIGION. They rather connected this [universal] religion with the cultus-wisdom of BABYLON and SYRIA” Harnack, a church historian (VoI. 1, p. 246).

When Justin Martyr wrote [152 A.D.] his Apology, the sect of the Simonians appears to have been formidable, for he speaks four times of their founder, Simon; and we need not doubt that he identified him with the Simon of the Acts. He states that he was a Samaritan, adding that his birthplace was a village called Gitta; he describes him as a formidable magician, and tells that he came to ROME in the days of Claudius Caesar (45 A.D.), and made such an impression by his magical powers, THAT HE WAS HONORED AS A GOD, a statue being erected to him on the Tiber, between the two bridges, bearing the inscription ‘Simoni deo Sancto’ (i.e., the holy god Simon)” (Dictionary of Christian Biography, Vol. 4, p. 682).

Hasting’s Dictionary of the Apostolic Church, Vol 2, p. 496, states that there is “very slight evidence on which to reject so precise a statement as Justin makes; a statement he would scarcely have hazarded in an apology addressed to Rome, where every person had the means of ascertaining its accuracy. If he made a mistake, it must have been at once exposed, and other writers would not have frequently repeated the story as they have done

We see this quote from Justin Martyr and from Hasting’s “Dictionary of the apostolic church” that Simon Magus was in Rome about the year 45A.D., this is further stated by his birthplace, a village called Gitta. It is also stated that Simon Magus was honored as a GOD, due to his magical “demonic powers that were witnessed”.

Simon only used the name of Christianity to bring about his own desired ends. The Dictionary of Religion and Ethics says that Simon was “a false Messiah, who practiced magical arts and subsequently attempted, by the aid and with the sanction of Christianity, to set up a rival UNIVERSAL [Catholic] RELIGION” ((Apostolic Christianity )Vol. 11, p. 514).

From these historical accounts we see that indeed Simon Magnus was in Rome and was the head of his own church “Universal catholic”. In many of these accounts we also see that Simon Magnus was also consider by many to be God. Does that not fall in to place that the first pope aka Simon Magus was considered to be God. There are several places in The Bible that show that the Church of Rome would committee the sin of blasphemy and demand worship from men. (Rev,13:1),(Dan,7:11)(Rev14:11)…

In John 10:33, The Bible clearly gives the definition of blasphemy, “…a mere man, claiming to be God”. The list of blasphemy coming from the Papacy would fill volumes of books. Here are just a few examples:

“The pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ himself, hidden under a veil of flesh.” The Catholic National, July 1895

Here are some incredible claims that appear in a Roman Catholic dictionary, by Lucius Ferraris, entitled Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Vol. VI, and pgs. 438, 442 article “Pope.” and The Catholic Encyclopedia, 1913 edition, Vol. VI, p. 48 speaks of this book as “a veritable encyclopedia of religious knowledge,” and “a precious mine of information.”

“The pope is of so great dignity and so exalted that he is not a mere man, but as it were God, and the vicar of God.”

“The pope is as it were God on earth, sole sovereign of the faithful of Christ, chief king of kings, having plenitude of power, to whom has been entrusted by the omnipotent God direction not only of the earthly but also of the heavenly kingdom.”

There is no doubt that Simon Magus was called a god. Neither is there doubt that the papacy claims that the pope is God on Earth. The list of blasphemies of the papacy are too numerous to count. There are several historical accounts that Simon Magus was called and claimed to be God. We can even see this preserved in history with the very status that was spoken of by Justin Martyr. In 1574 excavators found a fragment of marble on an island in the Tiber River with the inscription “Semoni Sanco Deu Fidio.” Some interpret this as referring to a Sabine deity, Semo Sancus, but most likely it was part of the statue Justin Martyr described as having been dedicated to Simon Magus. There is little doubt in my mind that this is one of many similarities between the papacy and Simon Magus

Here is the transition of Simon Magnus being considered God and the first pope and the big mistake that many confuse Simon Peter with Simon Magnus. The next step to change Simon Magus to Simon Peter was with the title of a God by some of his followers. What is another name or title is there for a pagan god? Surprising as it may sound, it is a well-known fact among students of ancient religion, that the chief pagan gods worshipped in the early civilizations were generally known by the name or title PETER. That would make Simon Magnus also be formally known as Simon Peter.

The pagan priests of the mystery religions were called PATORS or PETERS. They had the power to interpret the heathen mysteries. This is further brought out by Bunson in his Hieroglyph, page 545, where he shows that the Egyptians — as The Bible also indicates — called their “interpreters” or priests: PETR, that is, PETER.

Notice some references to these sacred PETRAS found throughout the pagan world.

At the temple of Delphi in Greece, the chief object in the ritual was the PETRA (Pausanius, Bk. 10). At the Acropolis in Athens, Euripides tells us, the niches which held the idols were called the PETRAE (verse 935). It is well known that even the sacred book which was used in the celebration of the Eleusinian mysteries, was entitled “Book PETROMA,” PETER-ROMA — PETER’S BOOK (see Potter’s Antiquities, vol. 1, p. 356). Remember that the pagan temples were also called after the PETERS. The temple at Elis in Greece was called PETRON Lycophron, verse 159). Pytho at Delphi was called PETRAessa (Olymp. Ode 6). The oracle temple dedicated to Apollo in Asia Minor was called the PATARA and the oracle there was called PATAReus (“Eus” means “person who, one”) — (Lempriere’s Classical Dictionary, p. 438). Also PATRAE — an ancient town where DIANA had a temple (p. 438), and the oracle in Achaia was called PATRA (Jones, Proper Names of the OldTestament, p. 296).

Examples are too numerous to mention, but this should be enough to show that the name PETER, or its variants, figured very high in every phase of pagan worship. These PETER stones and temples were found all over the ancient world. “There is in the history of every oracular temple some legend about a stone; some reference to the word PETRA” (Bryant, p. 362). The world and history is littered with many example of the term PETER used as a title for a god.

I believe this leaves little doubt that the title of Peter would be given to someone that claims to be and was seen to be a god. There are just too many instances that this title has been given and used in historical accounts. This change from Simon Magnus to Simon Peter is how the good apostle was mistaken to be the first pope of the Roman Catholic Church. If there is doubt that people would mistake a person as being a God, we must remember that the apostle Paul and Barnabas were also mistaken as gods. Acts 14:11-12“ And when the people saw what Paul had done, they lifted up their voices, saying in the speech of Lycaonia, The gods are come down to us in the likeness of men. And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and Paul, Mercurius, because he was the chief speaker.”

DUE DILIGENCE = mind rot.

The only thing “going viral” around here is Lisa Hive’s crotch.