Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Liver injury is independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19
  1. Terry Cheuk-Fung Yip1,
  2. Grace Chung-Yan Lui2,
  3. Vincent Wai-Sun Wong1,
  4. Viola Chi-Ying Chow3,
  5. Tracy Hang-Yee Ho4,
  6. Timothy Chun-Man Li4,
  7. Yee-Kit Tse1,
  8. David Shu-Cheong Hui2,
  9. Henry Lik-Yuen Chan1,
  10. Grace Lai-Hung Wong1
  1. 1 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Medical Data Analytic Centre (MDAC), Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  2. 2 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Medical Data Analytic Centre (MDAC), Stanley Ho Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Jockey Club School of Public Health & Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  3. 3 Department of Microbiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  4. 4 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  1. Correspondence to Dr Grace Lai-Hung Wong, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Medical Data Analytic Centre (MDAC), Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong; wonglaihung{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Abstract

Objective Data on serial liver biochemistries of patients infected by different human coronaviruses (HCoVs) are lacking. The impact of liver injury on adverse clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remains unclear.

Design This was a retrospective cohort study using data from a territory-wide database in Hong Kong. COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and other HCoV patients were identified by diagnosis codes and/or virological results. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation was defined as ALT/AST ≥2 × upper limit of normal (ie, 80 U/L). The primary end point was a composite of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, use of invasive mechanical ventilation and/or death.

Results We identified 1040 COVID-19 patients (mean age 38 years, 54% men), 1670 SARS patients (mean age 44 years, 44% men) and 675 other HCoV patients (mean age 20 years, 57% men). ALT/AST elevation occurred in 50.3% SARS patients, 22.5% COVID-19 patients and 36.0% other HCoV patients. For COVID-19 patients, 53 (5.1%) were admitted to ICU, 22 (2.1%) received invasive mechanical ventilation and 4 (0.4%) died. ALT/AST elevation was independently associated with primary end point (adjusted OR (aOR) 7.92, 95% CI 4.14 to 15.14, p<0.001) after adjusted for albumin, diabetes and hypertension. Use of lopinavir–ritonavir ±ribavirin + interferon beta (aOR 1.94, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.13, p=0.006) and corticosteroids (aOR 3.92, 95% CI 2.14 to 7.16, p<0.001) was independently associated with ALT/AST elevation.

Conclusion ALT/AST elevation was common and independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Use of lopinavir–ritonavir, with or without ribavirin, interferon beta and/or corticosteroids was independently associated with ALT/AST elevation.

  • cholestasis
  • hepatitis
  • liver function test

This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.

https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors were responsible for the study concept and design. GL-HW, TC-FY, YKT and GC-YL were responsible for the acquisition and analysis of data, had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors were responsible for the interpretation of data, the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests TC-FY has served as an advisory committee member and a speaker for Gilead Sciences. GC-YL has served as an advisory committee member for Gilead, Merck and GSK, speaker for Merck and Gilead, and received research grant from Gilead, Merck and GSK. VW-SW has served as an advisory committee member for 3V-BIO, AbbVie, Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Janssen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum Diagnostics, Pfizer, TARGET-NASH and Terns; and a speaker for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Gilead Sciences and Merck. He has also received a research grant from Gilead Sciences. HLYC is an advisor for AbbVie, Aptorum, Arbutus, Hepion, Intellia, Janssen, Gilead, GSK, GRAIL, Medimmune, Merck, Roche, Vaccitech, VenatoRx, Vir Biotechnology; and a speaker for Mylan, Gilead and Roche. DS-CH has served as an advisory committee member for Roche. GL-HW has served as an advisory committee member for Gilead Sciences, as a speaker for Abbott, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Furui, Gilead Sciences, Janssen and Roche, and received research grant from Gilead Sciences.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval The study protocol was approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong—New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The data were obtained from a third party and would not be publicly available. Deidentified patient data were collected from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) under the management of Hospital Authority, Hong Kong. All patients’ data were deidentified in CDARS to ensure confidentiality.