Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Venues, Patrons, and Alcohol Use Dynamics: The Creation of a High Risk Sexual Environment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Venue-based HIV prevention interventions, especially in sex on premise venues, can disrupt high-risk sexual networks. However, prior to intervening, it is essential to understand the person-venue dynamics that contribute to HIV risk. As such, we conducted five ethnographic observations at each of six venues where alcohol is sold and sex occurs onsite (2 each porn theaters, sex clubs, and dance clubs) frequented by gay and other men who have sex with men (G&MSM) in the Buenos Aires metropolitan area. Alcohol use, sexual behavior, and person-venue dynamics differed markedly across venue types. In dance clubs, substantial alcohol consumption often preceded visits to the darkroom for sex which, at times, included unprotected anal and vaginal intercourse. Condoms, although available, were not easily accessible. HIV prevention messaging was generally non-existent. These venues are in critical need of interventions to reduce HIV transmission risk.

Resumen

Las intervenciones de prevención del VIH, especialmente en los lugares donde se pueden tener encuentros sexuales, pueden interrumpir redes de alto riesgo sexual. Sin embargo, antes de intervenir es esencial comprender la dinámica entre los lugares y las personas que concurren a estos sitios. Por ello, hemos realizado cinco observaciones etnográficas en cada uno de los lugares donde se sirve alcohol y donde también se pueden tener relaciones sexuales (2 cines porno, 2 clubes de sexo y 2 discotecas), todos ellos frecuentados por hombres gay y otros hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (G & MSM) en el área metropolitana de Buenos Aires. El consumo de alcohol, el comportamiento sexual y la dinámica del lugar diferían notablemente según los tipos de lugares. En las discotecas, el consumo abundante de alcohol a menudo precedía las visitas al cuarto oscuro (darkroom) donde se concretaba la relación que, a veces, incluía el sexo anal y vaginal sin protección. Los condones, aunque disponibles, no eran de fácil acceso. Los mensajes de prevención del VIH en general eran inexistentes. La intervención en estos lugares es crítica para reducir el riesgo de transmisión del VIH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bérubé A. The history of gay bathhouses. J Homosex. 2003;44:33–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Binson D, Woods WJ, Pollack L, Paul J, Stall R, Catania JA. Differential HIV risk in bathhouses and public cruising areas. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(9):1482–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Grov C, Parsons J, Bimbi DS. Sexual risk behavior and venues for meeting sex partners: an intercept survey of gay and bisexual men in LA and NYC. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(6):915–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parsons JT, Halkitis PN. Sexual and drug-using practices of HIV-positive men who frequent public and commercial sex environments. AIDS Care. 2002;14:815–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Beneden CA, O’Brien K, Modesitt S, Yusem S, Rose A, Fleming D. Sexual behaviors in an urban bathhouse 15 years into the HIV epidemic. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;30:522–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Woods WJ, Binson D, Pollack LM, Wohlfeiler D, Stall RD, Catania JA. Public policy regulating private and public space in gay bathhouses. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;32:417–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Binson D, Blea L, Cotton PD, Kant J, Woods WJ. Building an HIV/STI prevention program in a gay bathhouse: a case study. AIDS Educ Prev. 2005;17(4):386–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woods WJ, Binson D, Mayne TJ, Gore LR, Rebchook GM. Facilities and HIV prevention in bathhouse and sex club environments. J Sex Res. 2001;38(1):68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Woods WJ, Binson DK, Mayne TJ, Gore LR, Rebchook GM. HIV/sexually transmitted disease education and prevention in US bathhouse and sex club environments. AIDS. 2000;14:625–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weir SS, Pailman C, Mahlalela X, Coetzee N, Meidany F, Boerma JT. From people to places: focusing AIDS prevention efforts where it matters most. AIDS. 2003;17:895–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wohlfeiler D. Structural and environmental HIV prevention for gay and bisexual men. AIDS. 2002;14(Supp 1):S52–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wohlfeiler D, Potterat J. Using gay men’s sexual networks to reduce sexually transmitted disease (STD)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(10):S48–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor M, Montoya JA, Cantrell R, et al. Interventions in the commercial sex industry during the rise in syphilis rates among men who have sex with men (MSM). Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(10):S53–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly JA, St. Lawrence JS, Diaz YE, et al. HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:168–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly JA, St. Lawrence JS, Stevenson LY, et al. Community AIDS/HIV risk reduction: the effects of endorsements by popular people in three cities. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:1483–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Daskalakis D, Silvera R, Bernstein K, et al. Implementation of HIV testing at 2 New York city bathhouses: from pilot to clinical service. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(11):1609–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huebner DM, Binson D, Woods WJ, Dilworth SE, Neilands TB, Grinstead O. Bathhouse-based voluntary counseling and testing is feasible and shows preliminary evidence of effectiveness. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43:239–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huebner DM, Binson D, Dilworth SE, Neilands TB, Grinstead O, Woods WJ. Rapid vs. standard HIV testing in bathhouses: What is gained and lost? AIDS Behav. 2010;14:688–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elford J, Bolding G, Sherr L. Popular opinion leaders in London: a response to Kelly. AIDS Care. 2004;16(2):151–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Elwood WN, Green K, Carter KK. Gentlemen don’t speak: communication norms and condom use in bathhouses. JAppl Commun Res. 2003;31:277–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elwood WN, Williams ML. The politics of silence: communicative rules and HIV prevention issues in gay male bathhouses. In: Elwood WN, editor. Power in the blood: a handbook on AIDS, politics, and communication. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999. p. 121–32.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barreda V, Carballo-Diéguez A, Marone R, Balán IC, Pando MA, Avila MM. Prevención del VIH/Sida en los circuitos de levante HSH: una asignatura pendiente. Sex Salud Soc Revista Latinoamericana. 2010;6:41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grov C. HIV risk and substance use in men who have sex with men surveyed in bathhouses, bars/clubs, and on craigslist.org: venue of recruitment matters. AIDS Behav. 2012;16:807–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grov C, Hirshfield S, Remien RH, Humberstone M, Chiasson MA. Exploring the venue’s role in risky sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men: an event-level analysis from a national online survey in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42:291–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Grov C, Golub SA, Parsons JT. HIV status differences in venues where highly-sexually active gay and bisexual men meet sex partners: results from a pilot study. AIDS Educ Prev. 2010;22:496–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stall R, Paul JP, Greenwood G, et al. Alcohol use, drug use and alcohol-related problems among men who have sex with men: the urban men’s health study. Addiction. 2001;96(11):1589–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stall R, Purcell DW. Intertwining epidemics: A review of research on substance use among men who have sex with men and its connection to the AIDS epidemic. AIDS Behav. 2000;4(2):181–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Woolf SE, Maisto SA. Alcohol use and risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(4):757–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kalichman SC. Social and structural HIV prevention in alcohol serving establishments: review of international interventions across populations. Alcohol Res Health. 2010;33:184–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Moos RH. The human context: environmental determinants of behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Barker R. On the nature of the environment. J Soc Issues. 1963;19:26–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Barker R. Ecological Psychology: concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Barker R. Habits, environments, and human behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ittelson WH, Proshansky HM, Rivlin L, Winkel G. An introduction to environmental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Binson D, Woods WJ. A theoretical approach to bathhouse environments. J Homosex. 2003;44(3/4):23–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Moos RH. Evaluating correctional and community settings. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moos RH. Evaluating treatment environments: the quality of psychiatric and substance abuse programs (2nd edition). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Moos RH, Insel PM. Issues in social ecology: Social Milieus. National Press Books; 1974.

  39. Moos RH, Lemke S. Evaluating residential facilities: the multiphasic environmental assessment procedure. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Graham K, Homel R. Creating safer bars. In: Plant M, Single E, Stockwell T, editors. Alcohol: minimizing the harm. London: Free Association Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Graham K, Osgood DW, Wells S, Stockwell T. To what extent is intoxication associated with aggression in bars? A multilevel analysis. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2006;2006(67):382–90.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Leonard KE, Quigley BM, Collins RL. Drinking, personality, and bar environmental characteristics as predictors of involvement in barroom aggression. Addict Behav. 2003;28:1681–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Graham K, Bernards S, Osgood DW, Wells S. Bad nights or bad bars? Multi-level analysis of environmental predictors of aggression in late-night large-capacity bars and clubs. Addiction. 2006;101:1569–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Macintyre S, Homel R. Danger on the dance floor: a study of interior design, crowding and aggression in nightclubs. In: Homel R, editor. Policing for prevention: reducing crime, public intoxication and injury, vol. 7. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Quigley BM, Leonard KE, Collins RL. Characteristics of violent bars and bar patrons. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2003;64:765–72.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Homel R, Clark J. The prediction and prevention of violence in pubs and clubs. Crime Prev Studies. 1994;3:1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Homel R, Carvolth R, Hauritz M, McIlwain G, Teague R. Making licensed venues safer for patrons: what environmental factors should be the focus of interventions? Drug Alcohol Rev. 2004;23:19–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Graham K, Osgood DW, Zibrowski E, et al. The effect of the Safer Bars programme on physical aggression in bars: results of a randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2004;23:31–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lang E, Stockwell T, Rydon P, Beel A. Can training bar staff in responsible servicing practices reduce alcohol-related harm? Drug Alcohol Rev. 1998;17:39–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Russ NW, Geller ES. Training bar personnel to prevent drunken driving: A field evaluation. Am J Public Health. 1987;77(8):952–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Villaamil F, Jociles MI. Risk and community: The impact of HIV among gays in Madrid. The case of sex clubs. Sexualities. 2011;14:580–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sherriff N, McDonnell E, Bogen-Johnston L, Tunstall B, O’Brien O, the Everywhere Consortium. Engaging ‘gay’ businesses in HIV prevention ‘everywhere’: findings from a qualitative study in eight European cities. Health Educ J. 2013; 72: 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported with funds from the US National Institute of Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism (R21 AA018075; PI: I. Balán, Ph.D.) and the National Institute of Mental Health (P30-MH43520; Principal Investigator: Anke A. Ehrhardt, Ph.D) to the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at the New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIAAA, the NIMH or the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iván C. Balán.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balán, I.C., Barreda, V., Marone, R. et al. Venues, Patrons, and Alcohol Use Dynamics: The Creation of a High Risk Sexual Environment. AIDS Behav 18, 2097–2109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0759-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0759-2

Keywords

Navigation