Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News Feature
  • Published:

Science journalism: Breaking the convention?

Nature volume 459, pages 1050–1051 (2009)Cite this article

Blogs and Twitter are opening up meetings to those not actually there. Does that mean too much access to science in the raw, asks Geoff Brumfiel.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Authors
  1. Geoff Brumfiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

See Editorial, page 1033 , Essays, pages 1054 , 1055 and 1057, and online at http://tinyurl.com/sciencejournalism .

Join the online discussion on Nature Network .

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Discuss this topic on Nature Network

Related external links

Discuss this story on FriendFeed

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

ISMB 2009

ISMB 2008 FriedFeed site

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brumfiel, G. Science journalism: Breaking the convention?. Nature 459, 1050–1051 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/4591050a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/4591050a

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing