Elsevier

Organic Electronics

Volume 15, Issue 11, November 2014, Pages 2639-2646
Organic Electronics

Using unsorted single-wall carbon nanotubes to enhance mobility of diketopyrrolopyrrole-quarterthiophene copolymer in thin-film transistors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.07.021Get rights and content

Highlights

  • SWCNTs and diketopyrrolopyrrole-quarterthiophene (DPP-QT) copolymer composite.

  • 2 Times improvement of field-effect mobility of DPP-QT copolymer.

  • The maximum mobility reaches 1.3 cm2 V1 s1.

  • Understood the effects of SWCNT properties on the composite and the devices.

Abstract

Organic thin film transistors (OTFTs) were fabricated for the first time using a semiconductor copolymer of diketopyrrolopyrrole-quarterthiophene (DPP-QT) and unsorted single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). Three different SWCNTs having different tube diameters, length, and shape were used to investigate the effects of carbon nanotubes’ properties on dispersion of the SWCNTs in DPP-QT polymer, as well as the mobility and current on/off ratio of the OTFTs. The DPP-QT polymer was able to selectively disperse two types of SWCNTs. An optimal SWCNT loading was found to be 1.5–2.5 wt% for these SWCNTs, before the on/off ratio fell below 105 due to increased metallic tube content of the film. At this optimal loading, the field effect mobility was improved by a factor of two, with the maximum mobility reaching 1.3 cm2 V1 s1, when the SWCNTs with a short length and small tube diameter were used.

Introduction

A major goal for printable electronic devices is the development of organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) [1], [2], [3]. By replacing the brittle silicon based semiconductor with an organic semiconductor material, new opportunities for low-cost, flexible, and lightweight electronics exist, since an organic semiconductor could be integrated into large area electronic device via printing techniques in a roll to roll manner [4]. One of the most challenging aspects to this approach is generating a cost effective semiconductor materials with comparable electrical performance to amorphous silicon which has a mobility of 0.5–1 cm2 V1 s1. Over the past 10 years, a wealth of research has been published using single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) to generate high mobility films due to their high field effect mobility measured to be 79,000 cm2 V1 s1 and an intrinsic mobility estimated at 100,000 cm2 V1 s1 [5]. SWCNTs can be incorporated into the semiconductor layer of existing OTFT designs making them an ideal candidate for technology development [6]. Research into individual SWCNT channels grown by chemical vapour deposition (CVD) have been reported [7], [8], [9], [10], but these methods suffer from their inability to be scaled to production demands. Success has been made depositing filtered films of SWCNTs, but the process still requires multiple steps, making it labour intensive [11], [12]. Due to their tendency to aggregate in solution, a film of pure CNTs cannot be solution cast without the aid of a dispersing agent, which can affect film preparation and SWCNT performance [13], [14], [15]. It has been shown that oxidized or chemically functionalized CNT’s are more easily dispersed in solvents than defect free CNT’s [16]. However, these methods are not useful for semiconductor electronics, because altering the chemical structure of a CNT diminishes its semiconductor properties.

An alternative approach to generating a pure film of SWCNTs is to use SWCNTs to enhance the performance of organic semiconductors. Due to their high aspect ratio, a very small amount of SWCNTs can be added to a semiconductor polymer film increasing the films overall mobility [17]. This approach requires the semiconductor to be soluble and able to stabilize a dispersed SWCNT solution. Fortunately most semiconductor polymers consist of a conjugated backbone, allowing for a π–π interaction to help prevent the aggregation of CNTs in solution. One of the most studied semiconductors polymers employing this approach is poly(3-alkythiophene) [18], [19], [20]. Although mobility improvements up to 10 times have been reported [21], due to the low mobility of poly(3-alkythiophene), the absolute mobility values are still very low, for example less than 0.1 cm2 V1 s1. Recently a new class of semiconductor, diketopyrrolopyrrole-quarterthiophene copolymer with mobility up to 1.0 cm2 V1 s1, has been reported. It would be interesting to study if the mobility can be further enhanced by using SWCNTs as additive.

A major challenge with SWCNTs is that when synthesized, they are generated as a mixture of approximately 1/3 metallic carbon nanotubes (m-CNT) and 2/3 semiconducting carbon nanotubes (sc-CNT) [9]. The presence of metallic tubes is detrimental for OTFTs because beyond the percolation threshold they can create a conductive pathway essentially short circuiting the device. Additionally they have been found to reduce the on/off ratio of OTFTs [12]. To avoid the detrimental effects caused by m-CNTs, SWCNTs are semiconductor enriched. Three major techniques are employed for semiconductor enrichment to separate m-CNTs from sc-CNTs. Density gradient ultracentrifugation (DGU) has achieved the best purity, but has very small throughput ∼1 mg every 48 h [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. Other methods such as column chromatography [29], [30], selective oxidation [31] or separation employing SWCNT selective polymers [32], [33] offer higher throughput but are still well below commercial requirements. Most literature employing SWCNT films utilizes these semiconductor enriched SWCNTs [14], [34], [35], [36]. The challenge with this approach is that the cost to purify these tubes drives the cost of materials so high that an amorphous silicon film remains a cheaper option.

Instead of using high-cost purified SWCNTs we looked into the cheaper alternative of using unsorted SWCNTs. The focus of this research was to determine if this mixture of metallic and semiconducting tubes could be used as a viable option for mobility enhancement of the new semiconductor copolymer of diketopyrrolopyrrole-quarterthiophene, and if so, what physical properties of the unsorted SWCNTs are best for this application.

Section snippets

Materials

Three sources of SWCNT were studied in this report, one from Sigma Aldrich which will be abbreviated CNT-A, one from BuckyUSA abbreviated CNT-B and one from Cheap Tubes abbreviated CNT-C. These sources were chosen because these SWCNTs have different tube diameters, length, surface finish, etc. Full descriptions of the SWCNTs can be found in Table 1. CNT-A has short average tube length and the smallest tube diameter, CNT-B has shorter tube length comparable to CNT-A, but larger variation in tube

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that three types of unsorted SWCNTs can be stabilized by the DPP-QT polymer in a 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane solution. The CNT-B source was found to have a low loading capacity, likely due to the hydroxyl washing used to purify the tubes. CNT-A and CNT-C which are not chemically altered during purification were easily dispersed and stabilized by the DPP-QT copolymer. Morphologies of the films showed that the CNT-A and CNT-C were evenly dispersed in the DPP-QT with no large

Materials and general methods

All solvents were reagent grade purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as received. CNT-A was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (704,148) (6,5) chirality, carbon >90%, 77% (carbon as SWCNT), 0.7–0.9 nm diameter, 0.5 – 2 μm length; CNT-B was obtained from Bucky USA BU-203 –OH Hydroxy 95 wt%, 0.7–2.5 nm diameter, 0.5–5 μm length; and CNT-C was purchased from Cheap Tubes (SKU-0111) SW/DWCNTs, >99 wt%, 1–2 nm diameter, 3–30 μm length.

DPP-QT was synthesized following the procedure reported by Choi et al. [2].

References (47)

  • H.W. Lee et al.

    Nat. Commun.

    (2011)
  • Y.J. Song et al.

    Carbon

    (2010)
  • Y. Li et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
  • J.S. Ha et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
  • J. Li et al.

    Sci. Rep.

    (2012)
  • G.-W. Hsieh et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2009)
  • T. Dürkop et al.

    Nano Lett.

    (2004)
  • Q. Cao et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2009)
  • M.S. Fuhrer et al.

    Nano Lett.

    (2002)
  • S.J. Tans et al.

    Nature

    (1998)
  • C. Rutherglen et al.

    Nat. Nanotechnol.

    (2009)
  • C. Kocabas et al.

    Nano Lett.

    (2007)
  • M.Y. Timmermans et al.

    Nano Res.

    (2012)
  • D. Sun et al.

    Nat. Nanotechnol.

    (2011)
  • Z. Wu et al.

    Science

    (2004)
  • N. Rouhi et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2011)
  • M.D. Lay et al.

    Nano Lett.

    (2004)
  • D.S. Kim et al.

    Small

    (2005)
  • J. Zou et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2008)
  • A. Ikeda et al.

    Org. Lett.

    (2006)
  • M. Giulianini et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2009)
  • Y. Feng et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2011)
  • V.K. Sangwan et al.

    ACS Nano

    (2012)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Germanium nanowire/conjugated semiconductor nanocomposite field effect transistors

      2018, Organic Electronics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Utilizing carbon-based nanostructures for organic-based transistors, such as carbon nanotube-polythiophene [7–15], carbon nanocrystal-polythiophene [16], and graphene-polymer [17–21] FETs, has revealed remarkable progresses in field effect mobility with respect to the pristine organic devices. However, the presence of increasing amount of conductive nanotubes or graphene flakes in the active channel is detrimental to field effect behavior because they have been found to reduce the ON/OFF current ratio (<103) and may also disrupt the intermolecular stacking of molecules with π-π interactions [8,15,17,18,22]. Besides, the challenges of controlling semiconducting property and bandgap energy of those carbon nanostructures still remain.

    • Dual layer semiconducting nanocomposite of silicon nanowire and polythiophene for organic-based field effect transistors

      2016, Organic Electronics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The enhanced electrical characteristic is attributed to the beneficial role of nanotube and graphene, which build alternative paths for charge transport in the active channel. However, those blended composites could also lead to a reduction in ON/OFF current ratio (<103) due to the high conductivity of nanotubes/graphene; these carbon nanostructures may disrupt the π−π intermolecular stacking of the conjugated polymer matrix [22–25,29]. The challenges of sorting semiconducting and metallic carbon nanotube along with controlling bandgap energy of those carbon-class nanomaterials still frustrate future developments.

    View full text