Using unsorted single-wall carbon nanotubes to enhance mobility of diketopyrrolopyrrole-quarterthiophene copolymer in thin-film transistors
Graphical abstract
Introduction
A major goal for printable electronic devices is the development of organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) [1], [2], [3]. By replacing the brittle silicon based semiconductor with an organic semiconductor material, new opportunities for low-cost, flexible, and lightweight electronics exist, since an organic semiconductor could be integrated into large area electronic device via printing techniques in a roll to roll manner [4]. One of the most challenging aspects to this approach is generating a cost effective semiconductor materials with comparable electrical performance to amorphous silicon which has a mobility of 0.5–1 cm2 V−1 s−1. Over the past 10 years, a wealth of research has been published using single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) to generate high mobility films due to their high field effect mobility measured to be 79,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 and an intrinsic mobility estimated at 100,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 [5]. SWCNTs can be incorporated into the semiconductor layer of existing OTFT designs making them an ideal candidate for technology development [6]. Research into individual SWCNT channels grown by chemical vapour deposition (CVD) have been reported [7], [8], [9], [10], but these methods suffer from their inability to be scaled to production demands. Success has been made depositing filtered films of SWCNTs, but the process still requires multiple steps, making it labour intensive [11], [12]. Due to their tendency to aggregate in solution, a film of pure CNTs cannot be solution cast without the aid of a dispersing agent, which can affect film preparation and SWCNT performance [13], [14], [15]. It has been shown that oxidized or chemically functionalized CNT’s are more easily dispersed in solvents than defect free CNT’s [16]. However, these methods are not useful for semiconductor electronics, because altering the chemical structure of a CNT diminishes its semiconductor properties.
An alternative approach to generating a pure film of SWCNTs is to use SWCNTs to enhance the performance of organic semiconductors. Due to their high aspect ratio, a very small amount of SWCNTs can be added to a semiconductor polymer film increasing the films overall mobility [17]. This approach requires the semiconductor to be soluble and able to stabilize a dispersed SWCNT solution. Fortunately most semiconductor polymers consist of a conjugated backbone, allowing for a π–π interaction to help prevent the aggregation of CNTs in solution. One of the most studied semiconductors polymers employing this approach is poly(3-alkythiophene) [18], [19], [20]. Although mobility improvements up to 10 times have been reported [21], due to the low mobility of poly(3-alkythiophene), the absolute mobility values are still very low, for example less than 0.1 cm2 V−1 s−1. Recently a new class of semiconductor, diketopyrrolopyrrole-quarterthiophene copolymer with mobility up to 1.0 cm2 V−1 s−1, has been reported. It would be interesting to study if the mobility can be further enhanced by using SWCNTs as additive.
A major challenge with SWCNTs is that when synthesized, they are generated as a mixture of approximately 1/3 metallic carbon nanotubes (m-CNT) and 2/3 semiconducting carbon nanotubes (sc-CNT) [9]. The presence of metallic tubes is detrimental for OTFTs because beyond the percolation threshold they can create a conductive pathway essentially short circuiting the device. Additionally they have been found to reduce the on/off ratio of OTFTs [12]. To avoid the detrimental effects caused by m-CNTs, SWCNTs are semiconductor enriched. Three major techniques are employed for semiconductor enrichment to separate m-CNTs from sc-CNTs. Density gradient ultracentrifugation (DGU) has achieved the best purity, but has very small throughput ∼1 mg every 48 h [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. Other methods such as column chromatography [29], [30], selective oxidation [31] or separation employing SWCNT selective polymers [32], [33] offer higher throughput but are still well below commercial requirements. Most literature employing SWCNT films utilizes these semiconductor enriched SWCNTs [14], [34], [35], [36]. The challenge with this approach is that the cost to purify these tubes drives the cost of materials so high that an amorphous silicon film remains a cheaper option.
Instead of using high-cost purified SWCNTs we looked into the cheaper alternative of using unsorted SWCNTs. The focus of this research was to determine if this mixture of metallic and semiconducting tubes could be used as a viable option for mobility enhancement of the new semiconductor copolymer of diketopyrrolopyrrole-quarterthiophene, and if so, what physical properties of the unsorted SWCNTs are best for this application.
Section snippets
Materials
Three sources of SWCNT were studied in this report, one from Sigma Aldrich which will be abbreviated CNT-A, one from BuckyUSA abbreviated CNT-B and one from Cheap Tubes abbreviated CNT-C. These sources were chosen because these SWCNTs have different tube diameters, length, surface finish, etc. Full descriptions of the SWCNTs can be found in Table 1. CNT-A has short average tube length and the smallest tube diameter, CNT-B has shorter tube length comparable to CNT-A, but larger variation in tube
Conclusion
We have demonstrated that three types of unsorted SWCNTs can be stabilized by the DPP-QT polymer in a 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane solution. The CNT-B source was found to have a low loading capacity, likely due to the hydroxyl washing used to purify the tubes. CNT-A and CNT-C which are not chemically altered during purification were easily dispersed and stabilized by the DPP-QT copolymer. Morphologies of the films showed that the CNT-A and CNT-C were evenly dispersed in the DPP-QT with no large
Materials and general methods
All solvents were reagent grade purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as received. CNT-A was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (704,148) (6,5) chirality, carbon >90%, 77% (carbon as SWCNT), 0.7–0.9 nm diameter, 0.5 – 2 μm length; CNT-B was obtained from Bucky USA BU-203 –OH Hydroxy 95 wt%, 0.7–2.5 nm diameter, 0.5–5 μm length; and CNT-C was purchased from Cheap Tubes (SKU-0111) SW/DWCNTs, >99 wt%, 1–2 nm diameter, 3–30 μm length.
DPP-QT was synthesized following the procedure reported by Choi et al. [2].
References (47)
- et al.
Nat. Commun.
(2011) - et al.
Carbon
(2010) - et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(2011) - et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(2011) - et al.
Sci. Rep.
(2012) - et al.
J. Appl. Phys.
(2009) - et al.
Nano Lett.
(2004) - et al.
Adv. Mater.
(2009) - et al.
Nano Lett.
(2002) - et al.
Nature
(1998)
Nat. Nanotechnol.
Nano Lett.
Nano Res.
Nat. Nanotechnol.
Science
Adv. Mater.
Nano Lett.
Small
Adv. Mater.
Org. Lett.
Appl. Phys. Lett.
J. Phys. Chem. C
ACS Nano
Cited by (6)
Nanocomposite thin film structures based on polyarylenephthalide with SWCNT and graphene oxide fillers
2022, Mendeleev CommunicationsGermanium nanowire/conjugated semiconductor nanocomposite field effect transistors
2018, Organic ElectronicsCitation Excerpt :Utilizing carbon-based nanostructures for organic-based transistors, such as carbon nanotube-polythiophene [7–15], carbon nanocrystal-polythiophene [16], and graphene-polymer [17–21] FETs, has revealed remarkable progresses in field effect mobility with respect to the pristine organic devices. However, the presence of increasing amount of conductive nanotubes or graphene flakes in the active channel is detrimental to field effect behavior because they have been found to reduce the ON/OFF current ratio (<103) and may also disrupt the intermolecular stacking of molecules with π-π interactions [8,15,17,18,22]. Besides, the challenges of controlling semiconducting property and bandgap energy of those carbon nanostructures still remain.
Dual layer semiconducting nanocomposite of silicon nanowire and polythiophene for organic-based field effect transistors
2016, Organic ElectronicsCitation Excerpt :The enhanced electrical characteristic is attributed to the beneficial role of nanotube and graphene, which build alternative paths for charge transport in the active channel. However, those blended composites could also lead to a reduction in ON/OFF current ratio (<103) due to the high conductivity of nanotubes/graphene; these carbon nanostructures may disrupt the π−π intermolecular stacking of the conjugated polymer matrix [22–25,29]. The challenges of sorting semiconducting and metallic carbon nanotube along with controlling bandgap energy of those carbon-class nanomaterials still frustrate future developments.
Precise Control of Interfacial Charge Transport for Building Functional Optoelectronic Devices
2019, Advanced Materials TechnologiesLarge Electron Emission Current and High Electron Emission Stability of Hexagonal Close-packed Multi-lamination-layer Carbon Nanotube Cathode
2018, Guangzi Xuebao/Acta Photonica Sinica