Skip to main content

What do women (in technology) want?

I have the honor of serving on the ThoughtWorks North America "Women's Networking Board," WNB, which focuses on bringing more women into our company, particularly as developers, and supporting them well once they join us.  ThoughtWorks isn't alone in thinking about this issue.  The US National Science Foundation (NSF) has sponsored research on "Gender in Science and Engineering" (GSE) for more than a decade, and a google search on "women in STEM" (that's "Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics") provides a large number of useful responses before it devolves into pyramid schemes and pornography.  As all searches tend to do.

As part of my WNB duties, I've been interviewing my female colleagues on what motivates them to work at ThoughtWorks, and what they would like to see the company do to attract more women.  These conversations have been fascinating.  As an academic I once knew liked to say, "facts are friendly."  (He was a high-functioning psychopath, sadly, but I still like the quote).

Here are some preliminary insights I've gotten into the "STEM problem" from asking actual women about technology:
Agile software development is more social than most other methodologies.  I don't want to generalize that women are more social than men, but many women are repelled by the idea of working in a basement filled with black vinyl chairs, pervasive oversized gaming headsets, the stink of ancient sweat socks, and companions who grunt as their primary mode of verbal communication.  Companies (like ThoughtWorks) who do agile software development using small teams gathered around tables, encourage paired programming (and pairing of BAs, Devs, and Testers), often with access to daylight and herbal tea, should make themselves known to the female audience.
Companies who are trying to hire more women developers should advertise that fact.  It is empirically true that there are organizations out there where no sane person would want to be a woman developer, due to a pervasive misogynistic culture.  But there are plenty of companies (like, well, ThoughtWorks) who are NOT like that.  They too should make themselves known to women.  Women, like other people, respond well to a positive invitation.  Companies can differentiate themselves in the market by appealing directly to the female audience by reaching out to self-identified organizations such as the annual Grace Hopper CelebrationWomen in Technology International or Women 2.0.  
You can appeal to would-be female STEM-ers even at the high school level, if you are a company that is woman-positive and you offer agile development opportunities.  I tested this empirically over the past months by trying different appeals to a young woman of my acquaintance who is taking two hours of AP calculus and one of AP Chemistry per day--as a high school junior--and who tells me she "hates science" and "doesn't want to be a software developer."  I suppose she'll eventually take over the world instead, but here's what she suggested we all tell our overachiever high school women friends to get them to consider a job as a developer:
  1. "It's just like a co-ed study party."  Stress the social, group-effort aspect of computer programming.  Crush the stereotype of the fetid male-only dungeon.  
  2. "It will differentiate you on your college application."  
I can confirm that the recalcitrant young woman has now agreed to attend one week of computer camp to learn java next summer, just by being exposed to these two sentiments.  As she pointed out to me, if programming isn't for any individual, little harm can be done by presenting these messages.  But women who might not otherwise even try programming to see if they like it can be brought to the table with these two irresistible lures:  group effort and enrollment at the selective school of their choice. 

I would like to close with this cartoon from the inimitable Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal:

Comments

  1. Fantastic. Thanks for the feedback!

    ReplyDelete
  2. There are group who are planned to support girls interested in careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics and encourage a growth in the number of women who pursue those careers.

    Famous Women in Business
    Michelle

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Do You Vote Someone Off of Your Agile Team?

One of the conundrums of agile conversion is that although you are ordered by management to "self-organize," you don't get to pick your own team.  You may not have pictured it this way, but your agile team members are going to be the same people you worked with before, when you were all doing waterfall!   I know I wasn't picturing it that way for my first agile team, so I thought I should warn you.  (I thought I was going to get between six and eight original Agile Manifesto signers.  That didn't happen.). Why "warn" you (as opposed to "reassure" you, say)?  Because the agile process is going to reveal every wart, mole, quirk, goiter, and flatulence issue on the team within a few hours.  In the old days, you could all be eccentric or even unpleasant in your own cube, communicating only by document, wiki, email, and, in extreme situations, by phone.  Now you are suddenly forced to interact in real time, perhaps in person, with written messag

A Corporate Agile 10-point Checklist

I'm pretty sure my few remaining friends in the "small, collocated team agile" community are going to desert me after this, but I actually have a checklist of 10 things to think about if you're a product owner at a big company thinking of trying out some agile today.  Some of these might even apply to you if you're in a smaller place.  So at the risk of inciting an anti-checklist riot (I'm sorry, Pez!), I am putting this out there in case it is helpful to someone else. From http://www.yogawithjohn.com/tag/yoga-class/ Here's what you should think about: 1.        Your staffing pattern.  A full agile project requires that you have the full team engaged for the whole duration of the project at the right ratios.  So as you provision the project, check to see whether you can arrange this staffing pattern.  If not, you will encounter risks because of missing people.  Concretely it means that: a.        You need your user experience people (if a

Your Agile Transformation Needs to Start with a Quiet Phase

From a really great blog post on agile adoption:  http://smoovejazz.wordpress.com/2011/02/16/an-agile-approach-for-adopting-agile-practices/ I've observed some different agile transformation patterns, and maybe you have too: Just Do Standups   (Shoot, then Aim):   some people feel that since you're "agile," you should just start doing stuff, like daily standups, and then build more of the the plan as you go.  Find a team and start doing some agile with them!  Start a revolution one practice at a time, one team at a time. Pros:   you're very busy from the start. Cons:   what exactly are you doing and why? KPI-Driven Change (Aim, then Shoot) : some people who have worked in large corporations for a while will tell you that to get the respect of the people, you need to start with a plan, support the plan with awesome printed and online collateral.  Then you "kick off," tell teams what to do, and measure them using "Key Productivity Indica