Samantha Grant on Meghan’s pregnancy: ‘You can’t say anything negative’

Samantha Markle & guests Ray Darcy

Believe it or not, I actually think the royals’ plan has worked to a certain degree. The Royal Freeze-out is a devastating strategy when dealing with people who are capable of shame. Unfortunately, the White Markles are incapable of shame. The revel in being the tackiest, nastiest and most toxic people around. The palace still handled it the same way: a royal freeze-out, utter radio silence towards Samantha Grant and Thomas Markle and everyone else. And things genuinely slowed down, minus Samantha setting up that paparazzo photoshoot at the palace gate. Of course it bugs me that outlets like the Daily Mail and The Sun are still paying these jackasses for interviews and photos. But you have to admit, there has been a significant shift in perception as the White Markles continued to pile abuse on Meghan.

Here’s something else that changes the perception around Meghan: she’s pregnant now, and the public at large is going to have BIG problems if her relatives continue to attack a pregnant woman. Which is why Samantha Grant is taking a more cautious tone in a new interview with the Daily Mail. This interview proves two things at once: Samantha knows it won’t go over well if she attacks a pregnant duchess AND Samantha is still completely desperate for any kind of access. Some highlights:

Samantha on Meghan’s pregnancy: “Everybody just needs to shut the heck up and let this be a great thing for them, for the world, for the family and that’s where I’m at. I was literally jumping for joy in my wheelchair…. It’s so important that everybody put their egos aside. Meghan’s done some things with my dad, but in my heart, I love her and I want her and the baby to do well. I was kind of overwhelmed with emotion [when I heard] and I just thought, I’m letting everything go. It’s beautiful and I’m so excited for Harry too.”

Now Samantha wants peace: “I think everybody really just needs to come together and realize this is really important and special for Meg, for Harry, for the child, for all of us, and we need to stop the sparring. I want things to be alright in my family and everybody has to be on the same page. I want that for the child but I want that for Meg too.” Despite her highly-publicized grudge against her sister, Samantha said any ill feelings she had ‘all went away’ upon learning the news. “A baby is incredible. You can’t say anything negative. You can’t feel anything negative. It’s just a beautiful, amazing thing. So my reaction was, “screw all this stuff and everything that’s been said.”‘

[From The Daily Mail]

Thomas Markle already has a bunch of grandchildren that he ignores, including Samantha’s three children. Some of you have claimed that Samantha doesn’t even have custodial rights to her kids either. So, again, why is the Daily Mail even interviewing her and treating her like her opinion is in any way valid? But here, truer words were never spoken: “You can’t say anything negative.” Trust her, she desperately wants to say something negative. She desperately wants to trash her half-sister, but Samantha knows that trashing a pregnant woman will be game over. Also: “Meghan’s done some things with my dad…” Yeah, she invited Thomas to her wedding and he faked a heart attack and then sold her out about a hundred times over the course of six months. That’s what happened.

Samantha Markle & guests Ray Darcy

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

92 Responses to “Samantha Grant on Meghan’s pregnancy: ‘You can’t say anything negative’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Nev says:

    So does that mean for the next 5-6 months she will STFU?

    • PrincessK says:

      She is a born liar, and I bet she got money for this recent click bait. Her next move will be to complain that Meghan won’t let their father see the baby. Scammy will never shut up, unless she breaches the law. She is just another jealous troll, and I bet that inside she is fuming that Meghan got pregnant quickly.

      • Swack says:

        I read the article on the Daily Mail (yeah, I went there) and she has already said that Thomas Sr needs to be involved in the child’s life. Also this: Meghan’s done some things with my dad . . . is saying something negative in a round about way.

      • Susannah says:

        She loves this. Next year she’ll complain about “our dad” not being there when the baby was born, not having Thomas in the names if the baby’s a boy, not being at the christening, Samantha not picked as a godparent, etc. She just lying in wait for that baby to be born as that baby will be a huge money-making scheme for that grifter.

    • Bella DuPont says:

      “Samantha Grant is taking a more cautious tone….”

      Ha! That is a verrrryyyy optimistic view, Kaiser!

      She’s NOT going to be able to restrain herself for 5 months till the birth…….Who wants to bet?

      On another note, I have a lay-man’s theory for why she’s so shameless….
      Madame Carnival Barker has never had any self-worth, honour or any genuine respect for herself. It’s what happens when you’ve never achieved anything of note for yourself – You never build any self-regard.

      Since there’s no self-regard to damage….it’s impossible to shame her.

      I give it one month (max!) before she cracks and comes back, all fangs and claws, full force.

    • rabbitgirl says:

      She won’t shut up. She will whine that she has no access to her niece or nephew whom she loves because WHEELCHAIR. Jesus, this woman using her wheelchair (jumped up and down for joy in my wheelchair) for these stunts is just so ugly.

      • Catrìona says:

        Samantha is not confined to a wheelchair. There is a photo taken of her in her house. (You can find it on the web – her hair is blonde and she’s wearing a white blouse. The room has pale yellow walls.) In that photo you will see that her house is not wheelchair accessible.

        You will see a chair leg sticking out into the hallway which would make it impossible to push the even the most narrow, stripped-down, wheelchair around the corner in the room where the photo was taken, and down that hall (much less that heavy chair she uses).

        Also, in the same pfoto there is an ugly wooden what-not (just behind her left shoulder in the photo) that is blocking the turning radius that a wheelchair would require to make a turn from the room where she is sitting into the hall. In American houses, halls like that lead either to the bedroom/toilet/bathroom area, or to the front door, areas that are essential for full access to a resident.

        Now, if she is walking, those objects wouldn’t be an impediment. (I’ve been in wheelchairs since I was ten, so I’ve spent a lifetime scoping out rooms.) So yes, her pretending that she is completely wheelchair bound is a ploy.

      • Veronica S. says:

        Not that she isn’t an jackass, but ah…I’d be careful criticizing what she defines as wheelchair enabled (which is the preferred term, btw). Plenty of people don’t have accessible homes because they don’t need it as much when they’re in a restricted space where they can sit down and rest regularly – and because it can be an expensive update. There are a fair number of disabled people who need their wheelchairs part-time rather than full time when they’re moving long distance, but that doesn’t make it any less of a real need.

        So she may be milking it for press like a douchebag, but she may actually need it, too.

      • Catrìona says:

        @Veronica S.

        You are right. That is why I wrote: ‘So yes, her pretending that she is *completely* wheelchair bound is a ploy.’ (Emphasis is on ‘completely’.)

        Her wheelchair may indeed be a real need for her when the situation calls for walking distances, over certain terrain, if the situation will require standing for a long period of time, and/or other situations that I haven’t thought of.

        Normally I wouldn’t see anyone’s limitations as being any other person’s business. Certainly not my business.

        However, when someone uses disability to play for pity, expecting special treatment in areas not related to the disability, then they open themselves up to scrutiny. The problem with Samantha is that she has shown herself to be such a liar it is impossible to simply take at face value anything she says.

        My point was that it is clear from the photo that at this time she is not disabled to the extent she pretends.

        “wheelchair enabled ” Ah… yes. I haven’t kept up. Last I remember it was ‘differently abled’. Where I live in France we’re still ‘handicapé’ and ‘en fauteuil roulant’. -LOL-

      • Catrìona says:

        Like I haven’t been wordy enough….

        An example of the manipulation I described [above] would be Samantha’s accusation that Meghan didn’t invite her to her wedding to Trevor because the wedding was held on a beach which wouldn’t accommodate her wheelchair.

        https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/meghan-markles-sister-makes-shocking-12534594

        That is complete nonsense and an example of pity-based manipulation. To be sure, it might not be wise to take a wheelchair like Samantha’s onto the sand. However, there are a number of ways that a disabled person can be brought down to a beach, and sat in a comfortable chair or lounge chair under a simple canopy to keep that person out of the sun. Or, the disabled person can hire a wheelchair with wide inflatable tyres designed to go on sand.

        Samantha wasn’t invited because she has been abusive cow all her life.

  2. LadyMTL says:

    “Everyone needs to shut the heck up…”
    Except her and her father, right? They can keep flapping their gums until the sun goes supernova?

    Man, these people…I lack words.

    • Meemow says:

      Yeah, who is she talking to with that statement and when she says they have to stop sparring? She’s so lacking in self awareness that she doesn’t see that she’s the one making all the noise in a one sided sparring contest. Hopefully she’ll take her own advice and stop with the negativity she’s generating.

      • Abby says:

        Yeah that jumped out at me too. Meghan and her team have said literally nothing about Samantha and Thomas. Nothing. So… is she telling herself to stop talking or what…

      • Lilly says:

        Yes, I thought “there’s no sparring, you’re just punching yourself in the face.” Stay with the removal of them from their lives.

  3. smcollins says:

    “screw all this stuff and everything that’s been said” says the woman who’s been doing all the stuff and saying all the things. 🤦‍♀️

    • Susannah says:

      Exactly! Also, everybody put their egos aside? They only egos are with the Markles who think Meghan and Harry and now baby Sussex will ever have anything to do with them!

    • LahdidahBaby says:

      Yep, exactly! As for her “everyone needs to stop the sparring” nonsense, she’s the only one sparring, and there’s only one way spar alone: by repeatedly punching yourself in the face. Job done.

    • KC says:

      😆
      It’s true though😞

  4. Digital Unicorn says:

    Thomas Jr has been selling stories – there is an article (don’t have the link) where he trashes Daddy and says that Sr used to tell him stories about his sexcapades in the Philippines (when he was still married to Meghan’s mother – now we know why they got divorced) and how he gave him ‘Thai’ sticks. Apparently daddy told Jr that you can get a couple of women for fifty bucks and they things they will do to you will make you a changed man.

    I wonder if we’ll get an exclusive interview on Sunday from Evil Pappa Smurf.

    • Zapp Brannigan says:

      ” you can get a couple of women for fifty bucks” 🙁 I just can’t with this planet anymore.

    • gingersnaps says:

      Wow! I don’t even know what ‘Thai’ sticks means but barf. The Philippines have got a not so great reputation when it comes to sex trade and that unfortunately includes underage as well. There are a lot of places that are known hangouts for pimps and the many girly bars as well. Seeing old foreign guys with local young girls/women always made me sad and uncomfortable. He is despicable, they should all go away and fade into oblivion. Didn’t Scammy made an ominous threat to the baby when Meghan’s pregnancy was announced? I wonder if she got a warning for that.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Apologies it was Thailand – the story is on RadarOnline and I can’t link to it. Yeah I know dodgy source but the Jr goes into deal with a F2F recorded interview. Thai sticks are drug paraphernalia.

      • Cal says:

        Thai sticks are actual hash, rather than related equipment. It’s just presented in an unusual shape/ form.
        Really strong stuff, I remember that much from student days. Makes this Murkle story even yuckier.

      • I looked it up and read a few times that Thai sticks are strong weed wrapped around a stick and dipped in opium. Basically a strong drug. What kind f father gives that to his kid!?! TM is disgusting.

      • Lokigal says:

        Thai sticks are essentially marijuana buds ‘kebab’ wrapped with marijuana leaves and then dipped in opium. I can’t even brain any parent giving it to their child.

    • lobbit says:

      deleted. yikes @me

  5. BlueSky says:

    ,I love her brazen hypocrisy, everyone needs to stop being negative and come together. B@tch, you are the problem. You didn’t care about having a relationship before she got with Prince Harry. I think the RF is doing the right thing in freezing them out. She clearly has no relationship with her own kids so she’s full of sh@t when she talks about everyone getting along. I really wish people would stop giving this hag a platform.

  6. CharliePenn says:

    These people don’t seem to realize that they are only having a conversation with themselves lol.
    Reminds me of my mom, she’s borderline ( has borderline personality disorder) . I allow her in my life but I engage very very little and don’t like to give her any actual information about my thoughts and feelings. Well, as far as she’s concerned we have a deep relationship, but she’s really only talking to herself all the time. Does that make sense? Like she allows my silence to be her chance to pretend we are having a back and forth. That’s what it seems like with this crazy sister, like she’s pretending there’s some relationship going on when in reality the other party is just not engaging at all.

    • Royalwatcher says:

      Makes perfect sense! I’m glad you found a strategy that works for you 🙂

      I think you are completely correct that Samantha is having this feud with just herself. The other thing I found funny is when she says “WE need to stop sparring” …as if Meghan has been going back and forth with her. The only people having a one-sided spar are you, Samantha, and Thomas Sr. I love that they are just losing it because they are being completely ignored. Meghan is just being apathetic (publicly) toward them and that’s worse than any insult because it shows she doesn’t even care enough about them to engage! That’s probably what hurts the most.

      I give it less than a month though before Samantha is back out there hurling insults. She just won’t be able to keep her pie hole shut.

    • Nikki says:

      People in my extended family are absolutely cray-cray. I have learned strategies that work for me that keep the peace a bit, so I know EXACTLY what you mean, and applaud you!

    • ClaraBelle says:

      Very good description of a NPD (or bi-polar). My best friend’s sister is a ringer for this crazy sister and she is definitely both. The only way to exist on the same planet with someone like that is to just be passive with them which they interpret as a good relationship which IS all in their head.

      It’s actually sad ’cause I think they can’t help it (faulty wiring) but it is often impossible to have a satisfying relationship with them at all. Meghan has taken the only course she can by not even acknowledging them.

  7. Kittycat says:

    Hopefully when the twin princesses Toronto and Niagara are born the Markles continue to keep quiet.

  8. skipper says:

    So, pregnancy is where she draws the line on harassment? Sure, Jan.

    Didn’t she make a threat about the baby just a few days ago?

    • gingersnaps says:

      That’s what I just wrote! Maybe someone warned her? Here’s hoping or maybe let her fall on her own sword.

    • Nikki says:

      What threat did she make?? (Sorry if I missed this..)

      • Lady D says:

        I can’t remember the exact wording, but it was something similar to ‘that baby better be in my dad’s life, or part of his life.’

      • gingersnaps says:

        “Samantha’s statement was a series of threats about how Meghan “left Thomas out of the statement” and “If he is excluded, I won’t be happy. It is in the best interests of the baby for my dad to be included.”

      • Christin says:

        She cannot let go being bossy, apparently. The child “must” be a part of Papa’s life.

        I thought that her last storyline was that he was in terribly frail health and Meg “must” see/talk to him, so this baby must be the cure-all for another year, at least.

  9. Neva_D says:

    “We need to stop the sparring.” We?! Girl, the only one sparring was you.

  10. Mira says:

    When it comes to people like Samantha I can’t help but wonder how many of them actually truly believe that they are the wronged party even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, and how many of them know deep down (or not that deep tbh) that they’re being utter assholes and that the righteous indignation is 100% fake and they just don’t care, as long as they get the money/attention they crave.

  11. Melania says:

    I think that Samantha and old dad are dying to be in the Baptism pics and this explains this change in strategy. They’re completely garbage.

  12. minx says:

    Well, that would be a first for her.

  13. HelloSunshine says:

    Anyone have info or links about Samantha’s relationship with her children? Totally not shocking that she doesn’t have a relationship with them but I’m nosy and want to know more lol

    • Raina says:

      Her daughter can’t stand her. Not sure of her other kids.
      Ten bucks says Scammy Sammy will shove a pillow under her dress any day now and say she’s pregnant too, borrow a baby in 9 months, hop over to the Royal Palace in a wheel chair holding an infant (or doll, because who knows with this one) and demand, “My child deserves to know her cousin! Meghan better arrange a play date if she knows whats good for her! She better be at Chuck e cheese in one hour.”

      • RedOnThe Head says:

        Raina, this made me spit out my coffee!! Even though the situation is not at all funny I had to laugh at this comment. And I’m with you, I’m betting she’ll be back on that crazy train any day now

      • Shaw says:

        She’ll rolled up to the gates and demand to deliver the baby gift in person. Heaven help the Duchess if a thank you card isn’t sent in 5 minutes

    • Toot says:

      Here’s a video of Samantha’s daughter and Samantha’s mother. It’s labeled cousin for some unknown reason, but it’s her daughter telling the story on their relationship.
      https://youtu.be/FbXPJb9ompw

      • Montrealaise says:

        Thanks for posting the link. It’s obvious that Samantha has had mental health issues for a long, long time, so why are the media continuing to give her a platform to spew her hateful, twisted opinions?

    • Anna nuttall says:

      A tweet on Samantha and how bat-shit crazy she is: https://twitter.com/KateGoldings/status/1046479405739126784

  14. Raina says:

    Scammy Sammy is right that “You can’t say anything negative”. But I bet SHE could. She’ll find a way. For a fee and attention, she’ll state the baby has horns if she was told to.
    Can’t choose your relatives. Can choose restraining order.

  15. Adee says:

    In the end…Meghan won!
    Meghan is entering a brand new chapter in her life, as a wife, a mother and a royal Duchess.
    Their old stories about her won’t be worth as much as the life she’s living now.

    The Markel’s will fade away as a bad memory, and she will flourish with her life and new roles.

  16. Anna nuttall says:

    Well one thing is certain, no matter how many ‘fake’ apologies she does – neither her or papa will ever see the baby.

  17. Nikki says:

    Kaiser, your take on this crew is SO on the money.

  18. Louise177 says:

    What I don’t understand is why nobody is reporting on the Markles. The media acts like they were a great close family but Meghan shuttle them out when she started dating Harry. They haven’t spoken to her in years. Nobody has mentioned that the demands the Markles are making now they didn’t care about before.

  19. Amelie says:

    She’ll hold off for a few weeks maybe but she’s already made negative comments on Twitter when the news first hit. I think she got a very negative reaction for her low key threats towards a pregnant woman. She can’t help herself. I’m really hoping by next year the media will be ignoring this woman.

  20. C. Remm says:

    Two face. She wrote three days ago:

    “No baby bump yet. So there was absolutely no need to wear this ridiculous pregnancy coat that added to the pregnancy speculations at Eugenie’s wedding. Suddenly she can wear normal, even tight fitting dresses again, it was all attention grabbing on a couple’s wedding day.”

    Of course not under her SM account. There is more. She is as nasty as ever, best would be not to cover her.

  21. agnes says:

    “You can’t say anything negative.”
    Oh, please, Samantha. Of course you can! That’s the one thing you are really good at: smearing your sister.

  22. RBC says:

    Samantha is the one Markle relative that is the scariest in my opinion. Calling Doria the “maid”, showing up a Buckingham Palace, numerous veiled threats and latest being a threat against a unborn child. She has a serious hate on for Meghan.
    There is something seriously wrong with her

  23. Vanessa says:

    this woman is something else you trash talk your half sister for over a year she uses dog whistle racial language to talk badly about meghan mother.she refused to take ownership of anything she keeps saying we as if their were others family members talking crap about meghan it was all her. How do you ignore someone for over decade and somehow you think after all the nasty things you say about her that she going to welcome you with open arms .

    • Aurelia says:

      She has Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I have a sister with it, a grandfather and an uncle who has it to a lesser degree. It is a distructive, hellish phenonemon. Normal boundaries, logic, shame issues, rules etc do not apply to these people.

      • Cal says:

        Whatever disorder she may or may not have, (apart from being just downright ghastly), she’s turned batshit crazed and dangerous over the royalty link, hasn’t she?
        It’s like the court of Charles II, with any remotely connected person selling their soul and abasing themselves willingly for a chance to drop royal names into their conversation, and claim intimacy with inner circles
        It’s truly revolting (and I speak/rant as an enthusiastic monarchist!)

      • Catrìona says:

        What I find so dispiriting is how many people, people who for years, decades even, have known the person being slandered, find it easy to accept as truth the lies, exaggerations, half-truths, and incomplete stories spread by the person with the personality disorder (PD).

        The natural response of the person being targeted is to say something like ‘but you know me’. The immediate response will be something like, ‘maybe I didn’t know you as well as I thought I did’ or ‘there are two sides to every story’.

        I can’t imagine what goes on in the mind of a person who criticises another individual for getting married, or divorced, or for dropping an old friend for reasons known only the individuals involved.

        I will never understand those people that I call the ‘family-bots’, people who believe that relatives have the right to demand the most unreasonable things
        from more successful members of their family.

        Finally, what does it say about Thomas Markle Sr that as a single man living in Mexico, he is unable to live in reasonable comfort on the $4,200 / month which is the monthly income he declared to the US government when he filed for bankrupcy? His rent is $695 / month.

      • Cal says:

        Yes indeed, well said. What a good choice of word, ‘dispiriting’. Exactly; you just lose what faith you had in us as a species; here’s our typical urge for envy and vicious begrudgery.
        (And Markle Senior…..ye gods what *else* is lurking there, behind his hastily created persona? So sordid)

  24. Snap Happy says:

    This is so racist. If Samantha was African American there is no way she would be getting this many interviews. She’s a psycho.

    • Absolutely agree, this situation with this awful, racist, abusive woman reeks of white privilege. The fact that the media is paying her to trash Meghan, whom they hate because she isn’t white, is racist as hell. This is a partnership made in hell. The media and Scammy are making money off of the public abuse of Meghan, they have no shame.

      And they wonder why Harry and Will hate the press! I can’t imagine being that tone deaf.

  25. AA says:

    This woman is awful and I feel bad for Meghan for a lot of reasons, but one of them is that they resemble each other so much – the nose and the eyes, for sure. Hard to forget who she is.

    • Clarisse says:

      Yes their facial features are the same. Father Markle has strong genes. Both daughters inherited his face.

    • kathy says:

      I don’t think they look alike at all.Meghan Looks like her mother Doria if you look. I sculpt. They have the same shape face, eyes, the only thing that looks Markle, is megs nose. Meg even got her more petite stature from mom.

  26. Lizbear says:

    This is my first ever comment on this site. Love all of the writers and love reading everyone’s comments. But why is this trash being covered on this site? This is a terrible person trying to use someone’s good fortune for gross personal gain. Celebitchy should stop covering these vile people. You can’t shame the other publications while profiting off of the same story.

    • Welcome, Lizbear, I hope you comment more often! I agree they shouldn’t be covered, her or her awful father. I will say, though, that this site doesn’t cover them very much at all. Kaiser even asked commenters to stop bringing up crazy Samantha so she wouldn’t have to cover her. Lol

    • Christin says:

      Well, the silver lining may be helping others see that just because someone is “family”, doesn’t mean you should feel compelled to be their doormat. I have gotten much more out of reading how people have gained peace from stepping away from toxic relatives.

  27. Ruyana says:

    Samantha Grasping uses the word “sparring”. Nope, sparring is when the other person hits back. This has just been Thomas and Samantha beating away at Megan in an attempt to lure her into striking back. She’s too smart for the two crazies, but I dare not hope they’ll give up trying.

  28. Chef Grace says:

    Ahahaha. Never laughed so hard 😂

  29. Honey says:

    Translation: I’ve made some nice money off of this. Thanks Megs. I don’t have to be jealous anymore. I’m going to go home, regroup and then I’ll be back but this time my strategy iwill be a baby represents new beginnings. I can paid off of that for an entire lifetime: “Meg & Harry withholds baby. 15 years. 15 years and we haven’t met our royal nieces and nephews yet.” Enjoy Australia!

    • kathy says:

      Eventually I think Scammy will stop getting the attention she craves, and the paycheck. This is a woman who lost custody of her first two children after a DWI, took a “settlement” of $10K from paternal grandparents. She said she was too young to raise them, she was in her 20’s! Then she abused youngest daughter through another failed marriage to Scott Rasmussen, he paid for her Stage Name, Samantha Grant. Her real name is Yvonne Marie Markle , then Hale, then Yvonne Marie Rasmussen, now Samantha Rasmussen. She uses Markle for attention. She is with her Boyfriend Mark Phillips, an ex-convict she met on facebook, moved him in, allowed him too to abuse her daughter Noelle. Finally kicks out daughter and they both publicly abuse her on twitter. A teenager, mind you. There are court documents under these names and child abuse documents are there. Don’t be fooled, there are 2 cases, 1 was dismissed, the other she didn’t contest. She tries to make every cent she can off her tenuous connection to Meghan, she lies, she sheds a tiny tear on tv, pockets the money and moves on to next. I think she show symptoms of NPD with Sociopathic tendencies. Scammy last saw Meg at Grandma’s funeral over 10 years ago. SHE claims they talked on the phone once over 3 years ago. There is also the 17 year age gap. All of these people have disowned each other and their children long ago. WHY is it Meg’s job to bring them together? Her father sold her out before the wedding, he then lied and stood her up at the altar, then dials up TMZ and insults her publicly, compares RF to Scientologists and stepford wives, says Meg looks unhappy. I would cut them all off too! Scammy has turned this into a career and the tabloids give her money because either they seem to be unhappy she is biracial. It is despicable. Scammy STALKED Meg in the UK, pretty serious, she is pushing her crap book. Then there is gun toting Junior, don’t get me started. Disown them all, no comment to any of them, the toxic trinity.

  30. Oliviajoy1995 says:

    She’ll be talking sh*t again within the next 6 months. If not by next week. If that baby is born and Meghan doesn’t “include” their father Samantha will be running her mouth then too.

    • Aurelia says:

      I don’t understand the rule in the U.S where you almost have to include grandparents in your children’s lives. I mean I have watched Dr Phil enough times. I am in New Zealand and I have lived in the U.K as well. I assure you all there is no such law. Thomas Senior is sh#t out of luck.

      I just don’t understand why the monarchy doesn’t quietly request the help of MI5 and get a couple of spook agents to head on over state side and scare the living bejesus out of scammy and thomas. I mean really threaten them if they open their mouths again something permanent might happen to them.

      I remember when Diana was so called embarrassing the royal family back in the day with her support of anti land mines. Now England was the biggest manufacturer of land mines so she was doing the business some harm. So Di gets a weird phone call one night, has paul burrell listen in and the guy tells her if she doesn’t drop her little pet project something horrible might happen to her. When she gets off the phone she tells paul she recognized the voice as Sir Nicolhas Soames, who at the time was the Defence Secretery. He was also the husband of her good long time friend Mrs Soames. So things like this do happen. Nothing is allowed to embarrass the royal family.

      • minx says:

        There is no such law or rule, plenty of grandparents don’t see their grandchildren for a whole host of reasons.
        As much as I would love to have the Markles shut up, I really doubt secret agents are going to travel to American and threaten them.

  31. Lea says:

    For his sake I hope the baby never gets to meet crazy auntie Sammie.
    Jesus Christ. The Markles strongly remind me of my family and I have spent the last 10 years avoiding them all.

  32. aquarius64 says:

    When Kensington Palace made the baby announcement and left Dad off the official statement it announced to the world the Markles are nobodies and nothings as far as the royals are concern. The American legitimate media took the hint and ignored them too; it only reported Doria’s reaction. It sunk into the Markles their bullying campaign backfired: Meghan, Harry and the royals didn’t cave and the majority of people think the Markles are scum.

    But in truth I think the Markles care what people think especially Samantha. They are only known for the horrible things they have done, even Dad’s Emmy wins are footnotes. They not only access to money and the finer things in life they want respectability. They think the royals inviting them and the baby will give them that. But the Markles have damaged themselves to the point that no one believes the apologies and people are waiting for the next attack.

  33. Mei says:

    ‘Of course it bugs me that outlets like the Daily Mail and The Sun are still paying these jackasses for interviews and photos. / ..again, why is the Daily Mail even interviewing her and treating her like her opinion is in any way valid?’

    Because those outlets are the epitome of f*ckin trash themselves. Everyone with half a brain here in the UK knows it, it’s likely why we are suffering through Brexit because Rupert Murdoch probably knew the fallout would sell for decades. I refuse to ever even give them page views because it’s validating their disgusting reporting.

  34. SJhere says:

    I wonder how much money she has made selling her bs stories to the tabloids? I’ll bet she’s raking it in and she is never gonna stop. Yuck.

  35. Shrr says:

    “We need to stop the sparring.” Seriously? I don’t recall sparring, but I do remember a lot of dirt being thrown by the white Markles.

  36. maraidh says:

    I have an equally wacky sister, and my heart goes out to Meghan. My sister also strikes out every so often, but I refuse to engage her in any way. My life became much more peaceful once I decided that I will not react in any manner, or acknowledge any of her attacks. It is the only way to deal with a toxic person.